How to Compute Inverse Fourier Transform for a Specific Function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on computing the Inverse Fourier Transform of the function \(\frac{\alpha^2}{2\pi}\exp\left(-\frac{1}{2} \alpha^2 C^2(K) \tau \omega^2\right)\). The key point is that for the transform to be valid, the parameter \(A\) must be negative, which translates to \(A > 0\) when adjusted for the new function. Participants confirm that the resulting expression for the inverse transform is \(\frac{\alpha^2}{2\pi}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2A}}\exp\left(\frac{t^2}{4A}\right)\). A variable transformation can simplify the integral to a standard form that can be referenced in integral tables. Overall, the adjustments in the function's parameters do not significantly alter the computation process.
mathy_girl
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm having a bit trouble computing the Inverse Fourier Transform of the following:

\frac{\alpha}{2\pi}\exp\left(\frac{1}{2} \alpha^2 C^2(K) \tau \omega^2\right)

Here, C^2(K), \alpha and \tau can be assumed to be constant. Hence, we have an integral with respect to \omega.

Who can help me out?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
So you want to find the inverse Fourier transform of
\frac{\alpha}{2\pi}\exp(A \omega^2)?

It should be:

\frac{\alpha}{2\pi}\frac{1}{\sqrt{-2 A}}\exp\left(\frac{t^2}{4A}\right)
 
jpreed said:
So you want to find the inverse Fourier transform of
\frac{\alpha}{2\pi}\exp(A \omega^2)?

It should be:

\frac{\alpha}{2\pi}\frac{1}{\sqrt{-2 A}}\exp\left(\frac{t^2}{4A}\right)

A < 0 is necessary.
 
One can do a suitable variable transform to get the integral in the form


∫e-x2 dx
with limits -∞ to +∞


which can be looked up in a standard table of integrals. I suspect the answer is what jpreed gave in post #2.
 
Whoops.. I just figured that there are two small mistakes in my first post, I would like to have the Inverse Fourier Transform of:
\frac{\alpha^2}{2\pi}\exp\left(-\frac{1}{2} \alpha^2 C^2(K) \tau \omega^2\right)

Here, note that \alpha is squared, and a minus sign is added in the argument of exp.

Don't know if that makes a lot of difference?
 
Not really. Just replace A with -A in all the responses.

mathman said:
A < 0 is necessary.

That would become

-A < 0​
or in other words
A > 0​
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top