How to Correct an Incorrect Proof Involving Set Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ash25
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
ash25
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


PLEASE HELP!How would you correct this incorrect proof:
Suppose that S∩T≠0,T∩W≠0,and for a contradiction S∩W=0.From the first 2,we have some t∈S∩T,and similarly t∈T∩W.But then t∈S,t∈T,and t∈W.So t∈S∩W,giving a contradiction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no way to correct this "proof", since what you're trying to show is false!

Take S=[0,3],~T=[1,5],~W=[4,10]. Then S\cap W=\emptyset...
 
Thank you, so the claim was true though, right? It was:
For any sets S,T,and W,if S∩T≠0 and T∩W≠0,then S∩W≠0
 
No, I just gave you a counterexample...
 
You are being so helpful thank you!
but you are saying that the claim is false?
 
ash25 said:
but you are saying that the claim is false?

Yes!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top