How to Correctly Apply KVL for Node Voltage Analysis?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) in the context of node voltage analysis for a specific electrical circuit. Participants are attempting to write KVL equations and are addressing issues related to the signs and consistency of their equations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about their KVL equations for the circuit, seeking feedback on their correctness.
  • Another participant points out that the equations presented are actually KCL equations, not KVL, and notes a sign error in the first equation.
  • A participant suggests that if summing currents entering the nodes, the equations need adjustment to reflect this approach.
  • Another participant proposes a different formulation of the second equation, indicating that it yields incorrect results with certain values substituted.
  • There is a discussion about the assumptions made when writing terms for currents entering or leaving nodes, emphasizing the need for consistency in sign conventions.
  • One participant highlights the inconsistency in the equations presented, particularly regarding the treatment of current directions and signs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct application of KVL versus KCL, and there are multiple competing views on how to properly set up the equations and handle the signs. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct formulation of the equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the correct signs in their equations and the implications of their choices on the analysis. There are unresolved issues regarding the assumptions made in the equations and the definitions of current directions.

James889
Messages
190
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I have this circuit which i am trying to write KVL equations for, but i just can't seem to get it right...

[PLAIN]http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/3374/upg255.png

The equations i have written so far are:
For v1: [tex]\frac{v_1-v_2}{5} +\frac{v1}{10} +1 = 0[/tex]
For v2: [tex]\frac{v_2-v_1}{5} - \frac{v_2}{20} -0.5i_x = 0[/tex]

Im not 100% sure this one is correct.
[tex]i_x=\frac{v_1-v_2}{5}[/tex]

Some pointers on whether these are correct or not, and in the case, what's wrong, would be appreciated.

Best regards
/James
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
James889 said:
Hi,

I have this circuit which i am trying to write KVL equations for, but i just can't seem to get it right...

[PLAIN]http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/3374/upg255.png

The equations i have written so far are:
For v1: [tex]\frac{v_1-v_2}{5} +\frac{v1}{10} +1 = 0[/tex]
For v2: [tex]\frac{v_2-v_1}{5} - \frac{v_2}{20} -0.5i_x = 0[/tex]

Im not 100% sure this one is correct.
[tex]i_x=\frac{v_1-v_2}{5}[/tex]

Some pointers on whether these are correct or not, and in the case, what's wrong, would be appreciated.

Best regards
/James

First, those are KCL equations, summing the currents leaving (or going into) each node.

Second, you have a sign error at least in the first equation (I didn't check further). Remember to be consitent -- sum the currents leaving each node (or entering, but I prefer leaving). What should the sign be on the current source term in the first equation for the node V1?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
berkeman said:
First, those are KCL equations, summing the currents leaving (or going into) each node.

Second, you have a sign error at least in the first equation (I didn't check further). Remember to be consitent -- sum the currents leaving each node (or entering, but I prefer leaving). What should the sign be on the current source term in the first equation for the node V1?

Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
Hm, as the 1A current is entering node 1 the sign should be a +, should it not?
 
James889 said:
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
Hm, as the 1A current is entering node 1 the sign should be a +, should it not?
Okay, but then you need a "-" sign for the currents leaving the node through the 10Ω and 5Ω resistors.
 
James889 said:
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
Hm, as the 1A current is entering node 1 the sign should be a +, should it not?

Redbelly98 said:
Okay, but then you need a "-" sign for the currents leaving the node through the 10Ω and 5Ω resistors.

So as RB says, if you insist on summing the currents entering the nodes, then you will need to adjust your equations to change the voltage subtractions to give you the currents entering the nodes.

Again, I prefer to sum the currents leaving each node, since that makes the voltage subtractions (divided by the resistances between the node voltages) more intuitive. It's easier to throw a "-" sign on a current source value in the sum, versus inverting voltage differences, IMO. But in the end, it's up to personal preference. Whatever is intuitive and accurate for you.
 
This equation conforms with v1 being 6v, v2 being 4v and ix = 0.4A.
[tex]-\frac{v_2-v_1}{5}-\frac{v_2}{20}=0.5i_x[/tex]

This is how i would write the second one.
[tex]\frac{v_1}{10} - \frac{v_2-v_1}{5} +1 = 0[/tex]

Putting v1 = 6 and v2 = 4 yields 1.2 instead of 0.

However if you put a minus sign in front of the first term it works out.

This does not make any sense. How can the current go from v2 to v1, and from v1 to v2 at the same time:confused:
 
You're still not getting your signs right.

When you're working on (summing currents at) a given node, say V1, and you have a resistor R connected from that node to ground, if you write a term V1/R, you are assuming positive currents are leaving the node. If you write a term -V1/R, you are assuming positive currents are entering the node.

With respect to currents from one node to another, if you're working on the V1 node and you write a term (V1-V2)/R you are assuming positive currents are leaving the node. If you write a term (v2-V1)/R, or equivalently -(V1-V2)/R, you are assuming positive currents are entering the node. If you are working on node V2, then the term (V2-V1)/R assumes positive current leaves the V2 node.

Either choice is ok, but you need to be consistent once you've made your choice.

This equation:[tex]\frac{v_1}{10} - \frac{v_2-v_1}{5} +1 = 0[/tex]

is inconsistent.

The two terms [tex]\frac{v_1}{10}[/tex] and [tex]-\frac{v_2-v_1}{5}[/tex]

are consistent with the assumption that positive currents are leaving the node, but the term

[tex]+1[/tex] is consistent with positive currents entering the node.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K