How to Derive Energy Expressions for Bound States in a 1D Potential Well?

Brewer
Messages
203
Reaction score
0
Question states:

Derive an expression for the energy of the bound states of a particle in the one-dimensional well defined by:

V(x) = \infinity x<=0 (Region I)
V(x) = 0 0<x<L (Region II)
V(x) = V_0 x>=L (Region III)

And its not been too bad. Up until a point.

I know for I \psi(x)=0.

In the region II \psi(x) = Acos(kx) + Bsin(kx)

In the region III \psi(x) = Ce^{-\alpha x}

where k = \sqrt{\frac{2mE}{\hbar^2}}
and \alpha = \sqrt{\frac{2m(V_0 - E)}{\hbar^2}}

I also know that at the boundary of II and III (x=L) that \psi_{II}(x) = \psi_{III}(x)
Solving for the even parity solutions I get tan(kL) = \frac{\alpha}{k} and for the odd parity solutions I get cot(kL) = -\frac{\alpha}{k}.

Now in order to find an expression for E I want to solve these equations for k (as k is a function of E).

Equating the 2 equations I end up with tan(kl) = - cot(kl), which on first glimpse seems ok, but after a bit of working I manage to get this to cancel to tan(kl) = i, and correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm sure that I can't do the inverse tan of i can I? Does this look like the right way to go about attempting this question? Have I just messed up the maths somewhere? Is there anything you suggest that might point me in the right direction?

Thanks guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Brewer said:
Question states:

Derive an expression for the energy of the bound states of a particle in the one-dimensional well defined by:

V(x) = \infinity x<=0 (Region I)
V(x) = 0 0<x<L (Region II)
V(x) = V_0 x>=L (Region III)

And its not been too bad. Up until a point.

I know for I \psi(x)=0.

In the region II \psi(x) = Acos(kx) + Bsin(kx)

In the region III \psi(x) = Ce^{-\alpha x}

where k = \sqrt{\frac{2mE}{\hbar^2}}
and \alpha = \sqrt{\frac{2m(V_0 - E)}{\hbar^2}}

I also know that at the boundary of II and III (x=L) that \psi_{II}(x) = \psi_{III}(x)
Solving for the even parity solutions I get tan(kL) = \frac{\alpha}{k} and for the odd parity solutions I get cot(kL) = -\frac{\alpha}{k}.

Now in order to find an expression for E I want to solve these equations for k (as k is a function of E).

Equating the 2 equations I end up with tan(kl) = - cot(kl), which on first glimpse seems ok,
no! You can not set them equal! Those are conditions for the energies of the even and odd solutions..Those are *different* solutions so those two equations should not be mixed! They correspond to different solutions of the Schrodinger equation.

What you must do is to solve separately

tan(kL) = \frac{\alpha}{k} and
cot(kL) = -\frac{\alpha}{k}.

Each is a transcendental solution. You must solve each graphically.

Hope this helps

Patrick
 
Is there no way to solve either algebraicly?
 
Brewer said:
Is there no way to solve either algebraicly?

Unfortunately, no.

Patrick
 
But this is the way to go about finding an expression for the bound states of the particle, correct?

It just seems odd to me that you have to do it this way, because while it is now a homework question, it is just a direct lift from an exam paper, where I wouldn't have time (or the capabilities) to draw these graphs.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top