How to derive Eq. (3.110) in Peskin's book?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physlover
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Derive
physlover
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm having trouble to derive Eq. (3.110) in Peskin's QFT book. In the book, it's said to use
u(\Lambda^{-1} \tilde{p})=\Lambda^{-1}_{1/2} u(\tilde{p})
But I ran into trouble to derive this. Here is my try:

The equation is equivalent to
u(p)=\Lambda^{-1}_{1/2} u(\Lambda p)
To make things simpler, I consider only a boost in axis-1 and a rotation in axis-3. In this way, the Lorentz transform on the momentum is given by Eq. 3.20 and 3.21 in the book, i.e.,
\tilde{p}^0 = p^0+\beta p^1
\tilde{p}^1 = p^1+\beta p^0 -\theta p^2
\tilde{p}^2 = p^2+\theta p^1
\tilde{p}^3 = p^3
Using Eq.3.37 in the book, and working on the left-hand portion of the spinnor
\left[ \Lambda^{-1}_{1/2} u(\tilde{p}) \right]_L =(1+i\theta\cdot \sigma/2+\beta\cdot \sigma/2) \sqrt{\tilde{p}\cdot \sigma} \xi
=\sqrt{(1+i\theta \sigma^3+\beta \sigma^1)\left[ (p^0+\beta p^1)-(p^1+\beta p^0 -\theta p^2)\sigma^1-(p^2+\theta p^1)\sigma^2 - p^3\sigma^3 \right]} \xi
Keeping the 1st order terms, I have
\left[ \Lambda^{-1}_{1/2} u(\tilde{p}) \right]_L = \sqrt{p\cdot \sigma +i\theta (p^0\sigma^3-p^3) -i\beta(p^2\sigma^3-p^3\sigma^2)} \xi
This is a little different from the left-hand portion of spinnor u(p).

Could someone help me find out what's wrong with the above derivation?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure I can help you, but the same law was used before while building solutions of Dirac equation in order to get u(P) from u(P-rest frame).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top