How to derive t1 in terms of t and t in terms of t1

  • Thread starter Thread starter manvirsingh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derive Terms
manvirsingh
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
1. (x=X1+vt1, x1=x-vt )

2.(t=t1+vx1/c2, t1=t-vx/c2 )


I know that 1. is x in terms x1 and x1 in terms of x.
I understand it very well, the adding and substracting of
velocity.

But i am unable to understand the 2.how these equation are
derived and what does they mean.

The mane problem is how they are derived.

Please help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
c2 means c^2 (c squared)?
This looks like a classical formula, as time passes at the same rate for t and t1. They are just shifted by a constant value, which is meaningless in physics (there is no absolute time in physical equations, just time differences).

Edit: Ah, those are the moving x1, x? Sorry, I am confused by your equations. Can you provide the source, or at least write them in a clean way (with tag would be perfect, together with an explanation what the parameters are)?
 
x=stationary observer
x1=moving observer
c2= c squared
v= velocity
 
manvirsingh said:
x=stationary observer
x1=moving observer
c2= c squared
v= velocity
That still doesn't answer the question. I assume x is supposed to be a distance (not an observer) so you have to specify between what and what and measured by who. Similarly for the other terms.

The Lorentz transform is usually expressed in a form something like<br /> \begin{align}<br /> t_1 &amp;= \frac{t - vx/c^2}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} \\<br /> x_1 &amp;= \frac{x - vt}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} \\<br /> t &amp;= \frac{t_1 + vx_1/c^2}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} \\<br /> x &amp;= \frac{x_1 + vt_1}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}<br /> \end{align}<br />
where

t = time between event O and event E as measured by observer A
x = distance between event O and event E as measured by observer A
t1 = time between event O and event E as measured by observer B
x1 = distance between event O and event E as measured by observer B
v = velocity of observer B relative to observer A

My equations look rather different to yours, so did you really mean what you wrote? And if you did, what do the letters mean (they can't be the same as the meanings I gave).
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top