How to Derive the Equation for Radial Dependence of Light in a Galaxy Image?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gantar
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the equation for the radial dependence of light in galaxy images, specifically how to convert photon counts per pixel into irradiance measured in W/m²*steradian. Key variables include N (number of photons), h (Planck's constant), c (speed of light), f (focal length), λ (wavelength), η (quantum efficiency), t (exposure time), S (pixel area), and D (telescope mirror diameter). Participants clarify that hc/λ represents photon energy, and dividing by time yields power, while η accounts for camera efficiency. The relationship between f² and D² relates to the solid angle in steradians, crucial for understanding how light spreads across the image. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these variables to accurately derive the equation and create an irradiance profile for the galaxy.
Gantar
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Explain how to derive the equation
Relevant Equations
I=[N*4*h*c*f^2]/[λ*π*η*t*S*D^2]
So we have a project and we are required to write how to derive the given equation yet we can't find any explenation, only the equation itself.
The equation is basically what we are supposed to use to get radial dependence of light for a given picture of a galaxy when we have values in photons per pixle and want to get W/m^2*steradian

N is the numbr of photons per pixle, h is Plancks constant, c is the speed of light, f is the focal length of the telescope, λ is the wavelength of visible light, η is the quantuum efficiency of the camera, t is time of exposure, S the surface of a pixle, D is diameter of the telescopes mirror.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gantar said:
Homework Statement:: Explain how to derive the equation
Relevant Equations:: I=[N*4*h*c*f^2]/[λ*π*η*t*S*D^2]

So we have a project and we are required to write how to derive the given equation yet we can't find any explenation, only the equation itself.
The equation is basically what we are supposed to use to get radial dependence of light for a given picture of a galaxy when we have values in photons per pixle and want to get W/m^2*steradian

N is the numbr of photons per pixle, h is Plancks constant, c is the speed of light, f is the focal length of the telescope, λ is the wavelength of visible light, η is the quantuum efficiency of the camera, t is time of exposure, S the surface of a pixle, D is diameter of the telescopes mirror.
You have not defined I. (What does "radial dependence" mean?)
Much of the way the variables combine is reasonably obvious. E.g. can you at least group hc/λ into something you can give a name to? What else?
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd and berkeman
haruspex said:
You have not defined I. (What does "radial dependence" mean?)
Much of the way the variables combine is reasonably obvious. E.g. can you at least group hc/λ into something you can give a name to? What else?

Im guessing its called irradiance in english (sorry i lack a bit of english knowledge) basically we need to make a profile of irradiance for a galaxy, but i think that's not as important at the moment. I am more looking for getting grayscale to irradiance.
Okay so hc/λ I am guessing is energy of a photon, so therefore we need to divide it by time to get power, so that's where the wats come from. N is just so we have power of all photons combined and we divide by S to get power per m^2 right?
Then I am a bit confussed by the η , don't really see a connection to anything there.
Also the f^2 and D^2 they mostlikely have something to do with steradian?

Also thank you for responding and helping, i really appreciate it:)
 
Gantar said:
Okay so hc/λ I am guessing is energy of a photon, so therefore we need to divide it by time to get power, so that's where the wats come from. N is just so we have power of all photons combined and we divide by S to get power per m^2 right?
Yes, that all looks right. And that would be W/m2 as recorded by the camera.
Gantar said:
Then I am a bit confussed by the η
To work back to the W/m2 actually striking the receptor one would divide by the efficiency.
Gantar said:
Also the f^2 and D^2 they mostlikely have something to do with steradian?
Indeed. The terms you have left are ##\frac 4\pi(\frac fD)^2##. Can you relate f/D to anything?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top