ElSalvador,
el salvadore said:
Fish,
all together creating a mass about 17kg.
Resistive heating, while plausible, is silly with this mass/volume.
el salvadore said:
As u correctly assumed, it will be only a limited run (~ 10), ...heat up material could easily take up to 10-15 minutes. Quality is more important though...
USE GAS
el salvadore said:
The support steel frame heated with gas is very good, simple and efficient idea and it was first thing came upon my mind when i started with design.
Resolve those issues, do not make this more complicated than it needs to be.
el salvadore said:
So the best way how can I manage this, is to build a heater consist of resistant wires encapsulated in some ceramic mass. So far I decided for design of heater such as split it into 3 separate parts, each of them contains one heating coil encapsulated in separated ceramic mass and each of them connect to different phase (not sure if I'm going to use delta voltage (between phases) or just single phase voltage for each part of heater, here in EU is delta around 400V and single phase 230V). I can also easily build in some temp sensor in each of them and provide better troubleshooting, maintenance and control also in case if one of them gets broken. Connect all of them to logic control device allows me to have full control "in my hands".
Quite honestly the control system is NOT dependent on the method of heat input chosen.
el salvadore said:
So far I can not move further within calculations because I've got stuck on develop of processing such a heater. The ceramic mass is unknown for me yet, i can not find any sufficient material thus I don't know the requirement parameters.
You are making this FAR MORE DIFFICULT than it needs to be. Heating copper homogeneously is almost a given, you would have a hard time messing that up in any reasonable time period given a 17kg mass.
el salvadore said:
I am an electrical engineer and building a gas device is not really my cup of coffee.
As luck would have it I am NOT an engineer @ all, but I have taken all of the core EE classes, and have 30+ years experience in welding/soldering, and I am here to tell you that you are making this a lot harder than it really is. You could make this as easy as heating a steel plate with oxy/act, or as complicated as a temp controlled ceramic heater, but @ the end of the day, the copper is going to heat fairly homogeneously w/o regard to method if time > a minute or two. I know you want to define everything, fine, but in the real world it is likely your "shop guys" could do this with a torch w/o any specs. Trust your journeymen, they will make this work.
Honestly, if you were doing even 1k+ units it would pay to design/order a heater, but @ ~10 units, let the journeymen mess up 10 units and deliver you 10 units, it is the best benefit/cost process.
If you are bound and determined to build a ceramic heater, and you want advice on resistive heating using a 400V 3phase source, of course you use three, single phase circuits with either SCR or TRIAC control elements, you could build in a feed-back loop to sense the temp of the mass, or the copper, but really this is secondary information. The heat mass/specific heat of the ceramic is unimportant, the only parameter you are concerned with is the temperature of the copper and components. I would suggest a shop tech & a laser temp sensor (or they could just look to see if the solder were flowing) to achieve this.
I do not mean to be ugly, but EXACTLY this type of engineering is what cripples low yield design projects. Engineers frequently want to use everything they learned in school to boil water, when boiling water was solved quite some time ago, by idiots. You obviously take your job seriously, and trust me when I say that is a GOOD THING, but you are making this project far more complicated than it needs to be. Heating copper homogeneously is pretty simple, apply heat over time. Re-Flow solder is pretty simple: achieve flow temp. Anything beyond these two concepts simply complicates things. If you were building 10k+ units and the chore was to minimize energy costs, sure, that is a good reason to refine the process, but @ ~10 units? Apply heat and go forward. Screw up 75% of yield and you are GOLDEN. Building a ceramic heater using company resources to prevent a loss of <$100 worth of copper is silly. Remember, at the end of the day, the same journeymen will use a torch, or watch your ceramic get hot; trust their skills or don't, but their labor is a fixed expense, we are only haggling over $1k in materials.
I hope I have not offended you, but I own my own business, and I hate waste in ALL of it's manifestations. While I am NOT an engineer, I make a lot of things work every day, despite engineering specifications. This in no way implies or presumes that I do not appreciate engineering, or that I hold it in contempt, i just hate to see it misapplied.
I hope you take this in the good spirit it is meant in,
Fish