I How to Determine a Photon's Wavefunction After it Collapses?

Flamel
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
How would one determine the spread of photon wavefunction after it has been collapsed?
Suppose one measures the position of a photon without destroying it. From my understanding, the wavefunction of the photon should collapse, and will return to a more spread out state over time. How would one calculate this, specifically the rate at which the wavefunction spreads out from the center?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on the exact shape of the wave function ##\psi({\bf x}, t_0)## at the time ##t_0## of collapse. Assuming that you know it, you first compute its Fourier transform ##\tilde{\psi}({\bf q})## to write this wave function as
$$\psi({\bf x}, t_0)=\int d^3q\, \tilde{\psi}({\bf q}) e^{i{\bf q}\cdot{\bf x}}$$
Then the wave function at later times ##t## is given by
$$\psi({\bf x}, t)=\int d^3q\, \tilde{\psi}({\bf q}) e^{-i\omega({\bf q})(t-t_0)} e^{i{\bf q}\cdot{\bf x}}$$
where ##\omega({\bf q})=\sqrt{{\bf q}^2}## and I use units ##\hbar=c=1##.
 
Demystifier said:
It depends on the exact shape of the wave function ##\psi({\bf x}, t_0)## at the time ##t_0## of collapse. Assuming that you know it, you first compute its Fourier transform ##\tilde{\psi}({\bf q})## to write this wave function as
$$\psi({\bf x}, t_0)=\int d^3q\, \tilde{\psi}({\bf q}) e^{i{\bf q}\cdot{\bf x}}$$
Then the wave function at later times ##t## is given by
$$\psi({\bf x}, t)=\int d^3q\, \tilde{\psi}({\bf q}) e^{-i\omega({\bf q})(t-t_0)} e^{i{\bf q}\cdot{\bf x}}$$
where ##\omega({\bf q})=\sqrt{{\bf q}^2}## and I use units ##\hbar=c=1##.
Thanks. If I understand this correctly, I would need to Fourier transform the wavefunction, then plug it into the bottom equation at ##\tilde{\psi}({\bf q})##, correct? How might the equations change if ##\hbar## and c are not equal to 1 and ##\omega({\bf q})## is not equal to ##\sqrt{{\bf q}^2}##?

Also how would I find the wavefunction after it collapses? I think I would need to use one of Maxwell's equations, but I'm not sure which one or how to go about it.
 
Flamel said:
Thanks. If I understand this correctly, I would need to Fourier transform the wavefunction, then plug it into the bottom equation at ##\tilde{\psi}({\bf q})##, correct?
Yes.

Flamel said:
How might the equations change if ##\hbar## and c are not equal to 1 and ##\omega({\bf q})## is not equal to ##\sqrt{{\bf q}^2}##?
That's left as an exercise for the reader. 😉

Flamel said:
Also how would I find the wavefunction after it collapses? I think I would need to use one of Maxwell's equations, but I'm not sure which one or how to go about it.
There is no simple way to find this, because it depends on details of the measuring apparatus. Note also that most photon detectors do destroy the photon, so your initial task makes more sense for electrons. For practical purposes, you can model your wave function after the collapse as a narrow Gaussian.
 
You can calculate the wave using classical electromagnetic waves. A photon is an energy quantum of that classical wave.

An example: a flux of coherent photons from a laser meets a narrow slit. The slit corresponds to measuring the x coordinate of a photon quite precisely.

The diffraction pattern of the electromagnetic wave tells you how the photon proceeds. Its velocity in the x direction has afterwards a large uncertainty and the diffraction pattern is very wide.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top