How to Determine Cable Tensions and Angles for a Suspended Leg Cast?

  • Thread starter Thread starter elbowgrease6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cable Forces
elbowgrease6
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the two cables suspending a leg with a cast in the drawing. If the leg and cast weight 150 N, and the angle of the ankle cable is 60 degrees above the horizontal, what are the cable tensions and the angle of the knee cable from the horizontal such that the leg is supported?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I know it seems simple, but I don't know how to start it. Thank you for any help.
 

Attachments

  • cast.jpeg
    cast.jpeg
    5.8 KB · Views: 601
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the leg is not moving, you can write the equations of statics, knowing the weight of the leg + cast, the c.g. of the leg + cast, and the tensions in the support cables. You know the angle one cable makes with the horizon, and thus can determine what the components of the unknown tension must be. For the other cable, the angle is unknown and must be solved for.
 
I think that is where I have gone wrong. I have written several equations:

-Tkx + Tax = 0
Tky + Tay - W = 0

-Tk(cos theta) + Ta(cos 60) = 0
Tk(sin theta) + Ta(sin 60) -150 N = 0

I think my main confusion is, is there a y term for the tensions? Because they do not tell you how much above the center of mass both cables are tied. Thanks again.
 
Okay, I solved it.

Theta = 33.56 degrees
Ta= 280.9 N
Tk= 168.54 N

Could anybody check and see if those seem right?
 
Not even close. Although you have written equations dealing with the components of the tensions, you have neglected to write any moment equations. Remember, for static equilibrium, Sum(forces) = 0 AND Sum (moments) = 0.
 
hint: you must have as many equations as you have unknowns. Look at the two equations you gave. There are 3 unknowns; the angle and the two tensions. So you need at least one moment equation
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top