How to Determine Capacitance with Variable Dielectric Dimensions?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining capacitance with variable dielectric dimensions, emphasizing the importance of correctly calculating areas and dimensions of the dielectric material. The user expresses frustration over not arriving at the correct answer despite extensive effort and attempts at integration. They clarify that the dielectric's volume remains constant even if its dimensions change, as long as the relationship between length and width is maintained. A key realization is that the area of the dielectric should not be assumed to be a fixed value, as it can vary based on the shape. Ultimately, the user successfully resolves the problem after significant contemplation and adjustment of their approach.
MetalManuel
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


ngrszs.png


Homework Equations


\int\vec{E}\cdot\vec{dA}=\frac{Q_{enc}}{\epsilon_{0}}
\int\vec{E}\cdot\vec{dA}=\frac{Q_{enc}}{k\epsilon_{0}}
V=\int\vec{E}\cdot\vec{dS}
C=\frac{q}{V}
C_{eq}=C_{1}+C_{2}+...
\frac{1}{C_{eq}}=\frac{1}{C_{1}}+\frac{1}{C_{2}}+...


The Attempt at a Solution


I didn't want to do the calculations in itex because it would take forever, but this is what i have so far. I just did the integrations quickly and went straight to the point and put in the equations.
1zpqurl.jpg



With the answer that I get I can't seem to get the answer. I have spent a lot of hours on this problem and it took me a while to figure out the proper areas and dimensions, but even after all that I am stuck. What is my problem? I have a feeling it has to do with the 4h^2 (it's not the right dimensions for the dielectric area).

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The volume of the dielectric is L*L*L/2 and is a constant? Where do you use this fact? I apologize if the answer is obvious.
 


Spinnor said:
The volume of the dielectric is L*L*L/2 and is a constant? Where do you use this fact? I apologize if the answer is obvious.

The volume of \frac{L^{3}}{2} is the total volume of the dielectric, but you can change the dimensions of the dielectric as long as long as l=w. For example, you can say that the dielectric is now \frac{L}{8}, 2L and 2L because the volume is still the same. You have to account for all the possible shapes that this dielectric can take.

edit:Imagine there's a piece of clay in between the capacitors, this will be the dielectric. You can shape the clay however you want and it will still have constant volume, just different dimensions. In this case though the clay would have to be a cubic shape, the two dimensions equal to each other.
 
Last edited:


I think I have figured it out, my mind is racing. Will update if I figure it out.
 


So i finally solved it, this is how I am feeling right now.
[PLAIN]http://r3dsky.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/1302819681876.jpg

This problem took me so long to figure out, I'm glad the torture is finally over.It says:
We know that the area is constant for the dielectric(for the square side, not the thickness, l=w). My initial thoughts of the area being 4h^2 was incorrect because h could be << than l and w, therefore I thought that the area could be described with a function:
4id2s6.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top