How to Determine if a Point Lies Inside a Tilted and Translated Ellipse?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sleeker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ellipse
AI Thread Summary
To determine if a point lies within a tilted and translated ellipse, the necessary formula incorporates the ellipse's center coordinates, lengths of the major and minor axes, and the tilt angle. The proposed equation is: ((x - x_c)cosθ + (y - y_c)sinθ)²/a² + ((x - x_c)sinθ - (y - y_c)cosθ)²/b² = 1. This formula effectively accounts for both the translation and rotation of the ellipse. The user is seeking a single formula to streamline calculations for approximately 2,500 points in their astronomical research. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately incorporating these parameters for precise point location within elliptical shapes.
Sleeker
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I need to find whether or not a point is within an ellipse. The problem is that the ellipse is tilted at an angle and not at the origin. I've tried Googling everywhere and can't find a good equation for what I need. Does anybody know the formula for an ellipse that includes:

1. Coordinates of the ellipse's center
2. Length of major axis (diameter or radius)
3. Length of minor axis (diameter or radius)
4. Angle the ellipse is tilted relative to x or y-axis (doesn't matter which, I can figure it out from there).

I'm doing astronomical research, and I'm trying to locate points within galaxies which are shaped like ellipses. The four things I listed are the things I am given.

Edit: I know I can translate and rotate my ellipse, but I would really like just one formula since I need to do this approximately 2,500 times for my astronomical research.

Another edit: Maybe this?

(\frac{x cos\theta+y sin\theta - x_c}{a})^2 + (\frac{x sin\theta-y cos\theta - y_c}{b})^2 = 1

a = major axis (radial)
b = minor axis (radial)
x_c = x coordinate of center
y_c = y coordinate of center
\theta = Angle of tilt from x-axis

I kind of just mixed and matched formulas until I think I incorporated everything. Is it right?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It may be simplest to compute a change of coordinates that tranforms to a coordinate system where the ellipse is not tilted. Then apply the change of coordinates to the points in question and solve the problem in the simpler setting.
 
Try this:

\frac{((x-x_c)\cos\theta + (y-y_c)\sin\theta)^2}{a^2}+<br /> \frac{((x-x_c)\sin\theta - (y-y_c)\cos\theta)^2}{b^2}=1
 
Hm, yeah, that makes more sense with incorporating the fact that it's off-center with the formula from this website:

http://www.maa.org/joma/Volume8/Kalman/General.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Back
Top