How to Diagonalize a Hamiltonian with Fermion Operators?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Enialis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamiltonian
Enialis
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am trying to solve a problem of 1D electron system.
Given a,a^\dagger,b,b^\dagger annihilation and creation operator which satisfy the fermion commutation relations diagonalize the following hamiltonian:

H=v_F\sum_{k>0}k(a^\dagger_ka_k-b^\dagger_kb_k)+\Delta\sum_k(b^\dagger_{k-k_F}a_{k+k_F}+a^\dagger_{k+k_F}b_{k-k_F})

where v_F,\Delta are c-numbers.

Prove that the spectrum is given by:
E=v_Fk_F\pm v_F(\Delta^2+k^2)^{1/2}

2. The attempt at a solution
I try to define the following operators (that form an su(2) algebra):
J_3=\frac{1}{2}(a^\dagger_{k+k_F}a_{k+k_F}-b^\dagger_{k-k_F}b_{k-k_F})
J_+=a^\dagger_{k+k_F}b_{k-k_F}
J_-=b^\dagger_{k-k_F}a_{k+k_F}
and to calculate the adjoint action but I don't know how to continue.
Please help me, thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The spectrum cannot be given by
E=v_Fk_F\pm v_F(\Delta^2+k^2)^{1/2}
because the units of \Delta and k are not the same. I tried rewriting the first term (linear kinetic energy) using operators shifted by k_F and then diagonalizing it, and I got
E=\frac{1}{2} (v_F k_F \pm (v_F^2 k^2 + 4\Delta^2)^{1/2})
Still may not be correct, but at least the units match.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top