How to Differentiate Cross Product?

AI Thread Summary
To differentiate the cross product of vectors U and B, the discussion references the equations dB/ds = -TN and dU/ds = KN, along with the relationship N = U x B. The key to deriving the equation dN/ds = TB - KU lies in applying the product rule, specifically the Leibniz rule, to the cross product. The original poster confirms they have solved the equation, indicating that the differentiation process was successful. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the product rule in vector calculus.
nabi1995
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,


I have a qustion.

dB/ds= -TN, dU/ds= KN (1)
N= U x B (2)


dN/ds=TB-KU (3)

How Eq.(3) can be obtained from Eq.(1),(2)?


Have a nice day!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
product rule
 
just like any other product. leibniz rule.
 
Thank you,

mathwonk said:
just like any other product. leibniz rule.

I solved the equation. Thank you!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top