How to Differentiate Cross Product?

AI Thread Summary
To differentiate the cross product of vectors U and B, the discussion references the equations dB/ds = -TN and dU/ds = KN, along with the relationship N = U x B. The key to deriving the equation dN/ds = TB - KU lies in applying the product rule, specifically the Leibniz rule, to the cross product. The original poster confirms they have solved the equation, indicating that the differentiation process was successful. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the product rule in vector calculus.
nabi1995
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,


I have a qustion.

dB/ds= -TN, dU/ds= KN (1)
N= U x B (2)


dN/ds=TB-KU (3)

How Eq.(3) can be obtained from Eq.(1),(2)?


Have a nice day!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
product rule
 
just like any other product. leibniz rule.
 
Thank you,

mathwonk said:
just like any other product. leibniz rule.

I solved the equation. Thank you!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top