How to distribute product sign across base and exponent terms

Devon79
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am calculating the likelihood of a hierarchical model and am having trouble distributing the product sign.

Here are the two expressions that I'm interested in:

Product from j=1 to j_k of: (t_jk)^(sum(Z_ijk) + a_k - 1)

and

Product from k=1 to K of: (b_k)^(j_k*a_k).

The tricky part for me is distributing the product sign across the base and the exponent terms simultaneously. Is it possible?

Devon
 
Physics news on Phys.org
<br /> \prod_{j=1}^{J_k} t_{jk}^{(\sum_{l=1}^L Z_{ljk}) + a_k-1} =<br /> \left(\prod_{j=1}^{J_k} \prod_{l=1}^L t_{jk}^{Z_{ljk}}\right)<br /> \left(\prod_{j=1}^{J_k} t_{jk}\right)^{a_k-1}<br />

<br /> \prod_{k=1}^K b_k^{j_k a_k}<br /> \; probably not much to do with this
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top