How to Estimate Resolution with Given Lens Parameters?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bemigh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Idea Lens
bemigh
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hey guys.
I have a lens problem:
A lens has a power of 300 dipoters, and a radius a of 2 mm. An object is located just beyond the focal length to get high magnification. The space between the object is filled oil with an index of refraction 1.4. Estimate the resolution for 500 nm light.

Ok.. getting started..
I know the resolution formula is: R=(0.61*lambda)/n*sine(theta)

Where theta is the angle between the R vector and the axis of the lens. So to find theta, i need to either solve for R, or s (distance between the object and the lens), and use trig to solve for the angle.
But I'm seeming to run into dead ends... basically using modified lens formulas that ask for the image distance and such.
any ideas?
Cheers
Brent
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Has anyone ever answered any questions on here
 
These are practice problems.When you are solved, I move them to the homework forums.
 
Slaterdom said:
Has anyone ever answered any questions on here

See here: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/read-me-how-to-use-this-forum.855656/
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top