How to evaluate the integral of dv/(1+(A/(mg))alpha*v) from [vo,v] = -gt?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nusc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate
Nusc
Messages
752
Reaction score
2
Someone please tell me how to integrate dx/(1+e^x).

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you have 1 + ex in the denominator, you would want something like d(ex) instead of dx. So let's try multiplying both numerator and denominator by ex.
\int \frac{dx}{1 + e ^ x} = \int \frac{e ^ x dx}{e ^ x(1 + e ^ x)} = \int \frac{d(e ^ x)}{e ^ x(1 + e ^ x)} = = \int \left( \frac{1}{e ^ x} - \frac{1}{e ^ x + 1} \right) d(e ^ x).
Can you go from here?
Viet Dao,
 
Or: almost the same thing, let u= 1+ex. Then du= exdx so that dx= du/ex.
The integral is \int\frac{du}{e^x u}
You still have ex in your integral but since u= 1+ ex
ex= u- 1:
The integral is \int\frac{du}{(u-1)u} which can be done by "partial fractions" giving exactly what VietDao29 had.
 
You can do it in another way ..

Multiply the numerator and denominator by e-x

so ..

\int \frac { dx} { 1 + e^x} = -\int \frac { - e^ {-x} } { e^ {-x } +1 } \ dx<br />

Now .. the numerator is the derivative of the denominator , so you can integrate easily .
 
Last edited:
I'm trying to evaluate int: dv/(1+(A/(mg))alpha*v) from [vo,v] = -gt

You should get [ v- ln(1 +(A/(mg))alpha*v)/alpha ] limits v and vo = -gt

I tried the partial fractions and it won't match the answer, that U - 1 will cancel with the 1 + a /mb alpha v etc.

you will get the ln over alpha but I have no idea where the V - in front of that comes from.

so your left with just a /mg alpha v which is not correct. the last method looked tempting but I would just end up with ln u which is even worse
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top