How to find a critical value of a distribution ?

AI Thread Summary
Finding a critical value analytically from a generic distribution, particularly Gaussian and Chi-Square distributions, is challenging due to the lack of closed-form solutions for their integrals. The discussion highlights that critical values are typically derived from numerical approximations rather than analytical methods. It is noted that no known closed-form expressions exist for these distributions, as established by previous research. The conversation also touches on the complexity of solving anti-derivatives for these functions, which have not been found using standard functions. Overall, the consensus is that analytical solutions for critical values in these cases remain elusive.
szandara
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am trying to find an ANALYTICAL way to extract a critical value from a generic distribution. I need a way to find it analytically because I am trying to find a relationship between the critical values.

I always find methods that depends on the distribution tables, but I would like to know how these tables are built.

I did not find anything on the internet?

any advice? ( in particular I am working with Gaussian and ChiSquare distributions)

thanks

Simone
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Computing critical values for a statistical test from distributions involves solving equations such as \int_c^\infty f(x) dx = 0.05 for the value c. If there is no "analytical" solution for writing the integral then there is no "analytical" way to compute the critical value. I am assuming that by "analytical", you mean a relatively simple "closed form" formula. Is that what you mean? I know of no "analytical" way to solve the intergrals involved in the normal and chi-squared distributions. The tables are built by using numerical approximations to solve the equations.
 
Last edited:
yes that was actually what I wanted to know.

So, I must suppose that there's no closed form for Gaussian and Chi Square distributions?
I haven't tried myself yet.

S
 
szandara said:
yes that was actually what I wanted to know.

So, I must suppose that there's no closed form for Gaussian and Chi Square distributions?
I haven't tried myself yet.

S

For those problems, that is equivalent to solving the anti-derivative of those functions, which so far as Stephen Tashi has said, has not been found (yet).

If you find it, be sure to let us know!
 
chiro said:
For those problems, that is equivalent to solving the anti-derivative of those functions, which so far as Stephen Tashi has said, has not been found (yet).

If you find it, be sure to let us know!

I believe they have been proven not to exist using only a finite expression of standard functions.

However, just like sin(x) is just a conventional name for a function, we also have \Phi(x) which represents the anti-derivative of the standard normal distribution function.
 
I like Serena said:
I believe they have been proven not to exist using only a finite expression of standard functions.

However, just like sin(x) is just a conventional name for a function, we also have \Phi(x) which represents the anti-derivative of the standard normal distribution function.

Yeah I said the wrong thing, thanks for pointing that out.

I meant to say an analytic way of solving for c, which for many cases (even polynomials with degree higher than say 4 or 5) present a challenge.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top