How to find a neutron dispersion curve

Ayotte
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A neutron is at rest inside a crystalline solid. Can a phonon come along and give up all of its energy to the neutron? Address the question with a graphical solution, i.e. overlay the dispersion curves for neutrons and phonons. For simplicity assume that the solid has a basis of a single atom and have only one acoustic branc

In the textbook, it says that a neutron's dispersion curve can only be found through experiment. Because neutron's don't really interact with much, I'm stumped about how to find such a curve in order to overlay the two.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
However, a simplified graphical solution could be to draw a horizontal line representing the energy of the neutron at rest, and then draw a curved line representing the phonon dispersion curve. The idea would be to show that the phonon's energy is distributed over different wave vectors (represented by the curvature of the line), and that its energy is lower than that of the neutron at rest. This would illustrate that it is not possible for the phonon to give up all of its energy to the neutron.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top