How to find eigenvectors of a 3 by 3 matrix

AI Thread Summary
To find the eigenvectors of the matrix {{2,-1,-1},{-1,2,-1},{-1,-1,2}}, the characteristic equation x^3 - 6x^2 + 9 yields eigenvalues 0, 3, and 3. For the eigenvalue x=0, three equations arise from the matrix multiplication, which can be solved using methods like substitution or Gaussian elimination. For the repeated eigenvalue x=3, two linearly independent eigenvectors are needed; any vector can be chosen to start, and then another can be derived from it. The discussion highlights confusion around solving for eigenvectors and emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between eigenvalues and their corresponding eigenvectors. Ultimately, the user resolved their questions with assistance.
gboff21
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Question: find the eigenvectors of {{2,-1,-1},{-1,2,-1},{-1,-1,2}}.

Equations: none

Attempted answer:

I have the characteristic equation as x^3-6x^2+9 which gives eigenvalues as 0 3 and 3. This is correct says wolfram alpha

for x=0 {{2,-1,-1},{-1,2,-1},{-1,-1,2}}•{x,y,z}=0
I get 3 different equations! How does this give an answer?

For x=3 I get -{{1,1,1},{1,1,1},{1,1,1}•{x,y,z}=0
which gives v=anything
So what the hell??

Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For x=0 you get three equations for three unknowns. That's exactly what you need. Use whatever method you prefer to solve (substitute, gaussian elimination, etc.) for x,y, and z.

For x=3 you have repeated roots. Since this multiplicity is two, all you need to do is find two eigenvectors that work that are linearly independent. As you demonstrated, anything works, so just pick something simple for the first and then use that one to determine a second.
 
For x=0. How do you get the right answer cos I constantly get {3,1,1} which is wrong.
And for x=3 how do you do do it. I don't understand how you use one randomly picked one, say {1,1,1} (which is one of the answers), to work out another!
 
Never mind I've done it. Thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top