How to find 'self locating digits' in irrational numbers

prane
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Let us take the most mainstream irrational out there, (Pi).

Now write (Pi) as:

3.
14159265...

Let us number the decimals of Pi.

0 gets paired with 1
1 gets paired with 4
2 gets paired with 1
.
.
.
6 gets paired with 6

Thus 6 is a self locating digit.

My question is then how do we devise a method to find these self locating digits in a fast way.

This is how I've gone about it.

consider λ=(Pi)-3=0.14159265...

now consider digit number n, that is, the digit that is n places along:

0 gets paired with 1
1 gets paired with 4
2 gets paired with 1
.
.
.
6 gets paired with 6
.
.
.
n gets paired with x

We need an algorithm for finding out what x is without writing the whole of λ out.

Consider a new rational number, ρ.

Let ρ_n be the number which terminates at digit n.

Then ρ_n=0.1415926...x
ρ_(n-1)=0.1415926...w where w is the (n-1)th digit etc

Now consider (ρ_n)*10^(n+1) this is equal to 1415926...x. Let us call this new number β.

We can then find what x is by subtracting ρ_(n-1)*10^(n) from β.

Now if the x = n we have a self locating digit.

This method isn't terribly practical as we still have to basically know what ρ_n is.

Maybe I'll come up with an improvement after some thought but in the mean time I'd love to see what you guys come up with :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
prane said:
My question is then how do we devise a method to find these self locating digits in a fast way.


This method isn't terribly practical as we still have to basically know what ρ_n is.

Right, the problem is that we have no formula for the n-th digit of pi that doesn't involve calculating all the preceding digits.

But it turns out that someone did find such a formula. It only works in base 16, but it's still amazing that such an algorithm exists.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bailey–Borwein–Plouffe_formula
 
It is a formula for all digits. But if you want to calculate a specific one, you can calculate it quickly, the wikipedia page explains how.

By the way, what happens to the 11th digit in base 10, for example? A digit cannot be "11" there.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
124
Views
28K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
17K
Back
Top