How to find the constant in this indefinite integration?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the constant in an indefinite integration related to motion, specifically in the context of kinematics and the equations of motion under constant acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the integration of velocity to find position and question the assumptions of constant velocity versus constant acceleration. There are discussions about the necessity of initial conditions to determine constants in the equations.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes various interpretations of the problem, with some participants suggesting the need for initial conditions while others clarify the assumptions made in the book regarding constant acceleration. There is no explicit consensus, but productive lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may assume constant acceleration due to a constant force, which is a point of contention in the discussion. Initial conditions are also highlighted as crucial for determining the constants in the equations.

Istiak
Messages
158
Reaction score
12
Homework Statement
Find constant of a indefinite integration for classical mechanics
Relevant Equations
$\int$
$$x(t)=\int \dot{x}(t)\mathrm dt=vt+c$$

That's what I did. But, book says

$$x(t)=\int \dot{x}(t)\mathrm dt=x_0+v_0 t+ \frac{F_0}{2m}t^2$$

Seems like, $$x_0 + \dfrac{a_0}{2}t^2$$ is constant. How to find constant is equal to what?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To find the value of the constant, you will need a initial condition, often ##x(0)=0## or in general ##x(t_0)=x_0##. Then insert it in your equation and solve for ##c##.

The reason is the following:
A differential equation has - depending on c - many solutions. Each solution corresponds to a flow through a vector field which is defined by the differential equation. The initial condition tells us where to start the flow, such that it will be the unique one that solves the equation plus its initial condition.

skPZv.png

ref.: https://mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/22190/why-are-these-flow-lines-cut-short
 
What is ##\dot{x}(t)## as a function of t? Don't assume it's a constant.
 
fresh_42 said:
To find the value of the constant, you will need a initial condition, often x(0)=0 or in general x(t0)=c0. Then insert it in your equation and solve for c.
If I try to do this way then, I get c=-vt

0=vt+c
c=-vt
 
Istiakshovon said:
is velocity... It's obviously constant [as far as I know]
Why do you assume that? Your book didn't!
 
Doc Al said:
Why do you assume that? Your book didn't!
What my book didn't do?
 
Istiakshovon said:
What my book didn't do?
It looks to me as if the problem assumes a constant acceleration, not a constant velocity.
 
Istiakshovon said:
If I try to do this way then, I get c=-vt

0=vt+c
c=-vt
If you set ##t=0## then you get ##c=x(0)## in the first equation, and ##x(0)=x_0## in the second.

Initial conditions could as well be at any time and of any value, e.g. ##x(5)=7## but it is usually ##x(0)## we are interested in because it makes the equations easier to solve for ##c##. It is also where the name comes from: initial as in starting point which is usually ##t=0.##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Istiak
  • #10
fresh_42 said:
If you set ##t=0## then you get ##c=x(0)## in the first equation, and ##x(0)=x_0## in the second.

Initial conditions could as well be at any time and of any value, e.g. ##x(5)=7## but it is usually ##x(0)## we are interested in because it makes the equations easier to solve for ##c##. It is also where the name comes from: initial as in starting point which is usually ##t=0.##
So, I can find $$x(t)=vt+x(0)$$ but, my book assumes that $$x(t)=x(0)+vt+\frac{at^2}{2}$$
 
  • #11
Istiakshovon said:
So, I can find $$x(t)=vt+x(0)$$ but, my book assumes that $$x(t)=x(0)+vt+\frac{at^2}{2}$$
You assume that the velocity is constant, but your book does not.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
  • #12
Doc Al said:
You assume that the velocity is constant, but your book does not.
How? If I integrate velocity than, I get position not acceleration... 🤔
 
  • #13
Istiakshovon said:
How? If I integrate velocity than, I get position not acceleration... 🤔
You're trying to find the position.

Do this: Start with a constant acceleration. Then integrate to find the velocity, and then integrate again to find the position.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Istiak
  • #14
Istiakshovon said:
So, I can find $$x(t)=vt+x(0)$$ but, my book assumes that $$x(t)=x(0)+vt+\frac{at^2}{2}$$
So? Your book says ##x(0)=v\cdot 0 +x(0)## in the first and ##x(0)=x(0) + v\cdot 0 +\frac{a\cdot 0^2}{2}=x(0)## in the second equation. But what does it say in the problem statement before ##c## occurs?

Without initial condition ##x(t_0)=vt_0+x_0## you get infinitely many solution from ##\dot x =v## and with initial condition only one solution: ##x(t)=v\cdot t +x_0##.

And in order to solve ##\ddot x = a## you need even two initial conditions because you integrate twice and each integral has a ##c##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Istiak
  • #15
Istiakshovon said:
I got confused... $$\dot{x}=\int \ddot{x} \mathrm dt=\dot{x} t +c$$
That's a good start. Now solve for that constant. Looks like they assume the velocity is v0 when t = 0.
 
  • #16
Doc Al said:
You're trying to find the position.

Do this: Start with a constant acceleration. Then integrate to find the velocity, and then integrate again to find the position.
Ohh! Thanks... got it...

$$\dot{x} (t)=\int \ddot{x} t dt=\ddot{x}t+c$$
$$\dot{x}(t)=\ddot{x}t+\dot{x}(0)$$
$$x(t)=\int \dot{x} (t) dt$$
$$=\int \ddot{x}t+\dot{x_0} dt$$
$$=\dot{x_0}t+\frac{\ddot{x}}{2}t^2+c$$
 
  • #17
Istiakshovon said:
Ohh! Thanks... got it...

$$\dot{x} (t)=\int \ddot{x} t dt=\ddot{x}t+c$$
$$\dot{x}(t)=\ddot{x}t+\dot{x}(0)$$
$$x(t)=\int \dot{x} (t) dt$$
$$=\int \ddot{x}t+\dot{x_0} dt$$
$$=\dot{x_0}t+\frac{\ddot{x}}{2}t^2+c$$
OK, much better!

And it looks like your book assumed a constant acceleration (because of a constant force) equal to F0/m.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Istiak
  • #18
Doc Al said:
OK, much better!

And it looks like your book assumed a constant acceleration (because of a constant force) equal to F0/m.
Hum..!
 
  • #20
I don't understand the confusion. We start with a constant force along the x-axis, ##F_0##. Newton's law says,
$$
F=ma=m\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}=F_0
$$
$$
m\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}=m\frac{d\dot x }{dt}
$$
$$
\frac{d\dot x }{dt}=\frac{F_0}{m}
$$
Assuming ##t_0=0## we integrate
$$
\int_{\dot {x}_0}^{\dot x}d\dot {x}'=\int_0^t\frac{F_0}{m}dt'
$$
with the primes indicating dummy variables of integration.
$$
\dot x - \dot {x}_0=\frac{F_0}{m}t
$$
$$
\dot {x}_0=v_0
$$
$$
\dot x=\frac{dx}{dt}
$$
$$
\frac{dx}{dt}=
v_0+\frac{F_0}{m}t
$$
Integrate again
$$
\int_{x_0}^x dx'=\int_{0}^t (v_0+\frac{F_0}{m}t')dt'
$$
$$
x=x_0 + v_0t+ \frac{F_0t^2}{2m}
$$
Does this help or am I missing something?
 
  • #21
Fred Wright said:
We start with a constant force along the x-axis
How do you know that? I don't see any links in this thread to the original question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
8K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K