MHB How to Find the Cube Root of a Number?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NotaMathPerson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube hand Root
NotaMathPerson
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Hello!

My book explained how to take cube root of a number withou using calculator. I managed to extract the cube root of number less than a million. But when its higher like this one 12812904. I cannot extract it.

Can you suggest an algorithm on how to go about this one? Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
NotaMathPerson said:
Hello!

My book explained how to take cube root of a number withou using calculator. I managed to extract the cube root of number less than a million. But when its higher like this one 12812904. I cannot extract it.

Can you suggest an algorithm on how to go about this one? Thanks!

Hi NotaMathPerson,

There's a method to find the cube root of a number, similar to long division mentioned at the following webpage. It might be the one you are looking for.

https://xlinux.nist.gov/dads//HTML/cubeRoot.html
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top