How to find the gamma function for a fermion vacuum energy calculation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the gamma function for fermion vacuum energy using the method outlined in Peskin and Schroeder's "An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory." The user begins with the Lagrangian $$ L=i \bar{\Psi} \partial / \Psi-m_{e} \bar{\Psi} \Psi-\lambda \Psi \bar{\Psi} \phi $$ and seeks to find the gamma function for the expression $$\operatorname{Tr} \log \left(\gamma^{\mu} \partial_{\mu}+m\right)$$. The conclusion reached is that the gamma function for this calculation mirrors that of the scalar field loop but with an opposite sign, suggesting a relationship between the Klein-Gordon equation and the Dirac equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts, particularly the Dirac and Klein-Gordon equations.
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics and effective action formulations.
  • Knowledge of Wick rotation techniques in quantum field calculations.
  • Proficiency in handling trace logarithms in the context of quantum field theory.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the gamma function in the context of scalar fields, particularly using dimensional regularization.
  • Explore Peskin and Schroeder's treatment of the Klein-Gordon operator and its implications for fermionic fields.
  • Investigate the mathematical properties of trace logarithms in quantum field theory.
  • Review the application of Wick rotation in quantum field calculations and its effects on fermionic integrals.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, theoretical physicists working on vacuum energy calculations, and graduate students studying advanced particle physics concepts.

The black vegetable
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I am trying to calculate one loop contribution to the vacuum energy from a fermion.
Following the method by Peskin and Shroesder 11.4 Trying to calculate the vacuum energy of a fermion. If my method is correct so far the next step is to find gamma function , the formula I have for gamma fuctions doesn't match this equation. Can anyone help with the next step?
Starting with the Lagrangian $$ L=i \bar{\Psi} \partial / \Psi-m_{e} \bar{\Psi} \Psi-\lambda \Psi \bar{\Psi} \phi $$Expanding about the classical field

$$ \Psi_{c l}+\zeta \quad \bar{\Psi}=\bar{\Psi}_{c l}+\bar{\zeta} \quad \phi \rightarrow \phi_{c l}+\rho $$

The only terms quadratic with with ##\zeta\bar{\zeta}##

$$\bar{\zeta}i \gamma^{\mu} \partial_{\mu} \zeta-m_{e} \bar{\zeta} \zeta-\lambda \bar{\zeta} \zeta\left(\phi_{c l}+\rho\right)$$When comparing this to the formula for the effective action this coincides with

$$ \left[-\frac{\delta^{2} L_{1}}{\delta\bar{\Psi}(x) \delta\Psi(y)}\right]=i \gamma^{\mu} \partial_{\mu}-m_{e}-\lambda\left(\phi_{c l}+\rho\right)=i \gamma^{\mu} \partial_{\mu}-M_{e} $$

In Peskin and Schroder P374 they are doing this with a scalable field Lagrangian, where they get the Klein Gordon operator instead of the dirac operator. If I follow the method the next stage is to find the Gamma function for


$$\operatorname{Tr} \log \left(\gamma^{\mu} \partial_{\mu}+m\right)=\sum_{p} \log \left(\gamma^{\mu} p_{\mu}+m\right)$$

Where after a wicks rotation they get something similar to this but for a scaler field.

$$=V T \int \frac{d^{4} p}{(2 \pi)^{4}} \log \left(\gamma^{\mu} p_{\mu}+m\right)=V T \frac{\partial}{\partial a} \int \frac{d^{4} p}{(2 \pi)^{4}} \frac{1}{\left(\gamma^{\mu} p_{\mu}+m\right)^{a}}|_{a=0}$$

How do I find the gamma function for this, it doesn't fit my equation?

Many thanks for your time
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To answer my own question, I think it turns out to be the same as the scaler field loop but with the opposite sign ,Klein Gordon equation is just Dirac Equation squared, So just replace it with the square root Klein Gordon equation, then because it's log bring the exponent (1/2) in front and proceed as you would with Dim reg scaler field.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K