How to find the integral of e^(sqrt(x)) as x goes from 0 to 1

  • Thread starter Thread starter ricekrispie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the integral of the function e^(sqrt(x)) from 0 to 1. Participants are exploring various substitution methods and integration techniques relevant to this integral.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss potential substitutions, particularly u = sqrt(x), and the implications of using integration by parts. There are questions about the appropriateness of certain techniques and confusion regarding variable transformations.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different substitution methods and integration techniques. Some participants express uncertainty about their approach, while others offer guidance on using integration by parts. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to clarify the steps needed to solve the integral.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention constraints regarding the use of specific techniques, such as integration by parts, and express confusion over variable substitutions. There is a recognition that the problem may not be solvable through simple substitutions alone.

ricekrispie
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



\int_0^1 e ^(sqrt. x) dx


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



i don´t know what to let u equal to... maybe sqrt.x? but what good would that do when u is differentiated?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hmm, your latek messed up

\int_{0}^{1} e^{\sqrt{x}}dx

yes?
 
yes, thanks... i´m still figuring out how to use it :smile:
 
Let u=\sqrt{x}

then, use another "simple" substitution so that you only have 1 variable.

then, you will need to use integration by parts.
 
i still haven´t figured the problem itself though...
 
ricekrispie said:
yes, thanks... i´m still figuring out how to use it :smile:
shoot, at least you've already almost got it down. there are ppl with like 500+ posts and still don't use latek, hurts my eyes :p
 
that was before learning integration by parts so i guess i´m not supposed to use it
 
ricekrispie said:
that was before learning integration by parts so i guess i´m not supposed to use it
what technique are you not allowed to use?
 
rocophysics said:
Let u=\sqrt{x}

then, use another "simple" substitution so that you only have 1 variable.

then, you will need to use integration by parts.

integration by parts... that's why i´m stuck
 
  • #10
there's no way around this problem without the use of integration by parts, want to work this problem together by use of parts?
 
  • #11
do i let u = e^\sqrt{x} ?
 
  • #12
the derivative of your substitution would then become

u=e^{\sqrt{x}}

du=\frac{e^{\sqrt{x}}}{2\sqrt{x}}dx

messy. then you will need to take the ln of your u-substitution so you can get your problem in terms of 1 variable.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
so then u is just \sqrt{x} ?
 
  • #14
ricekrispie said:
so then u is just \sqrt{x} ?
yes and i can help you through integration by parts, b/c we can't integrate this problem by simple substitutions.
 
  • #15
ok... u = \sqrt{x}
and du = du=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{x}}dx
 
  • #16
what would dv be?
 
  • #17
well first, let's make it a "t-substitution" b/c we'll need to use U and V for parts.

so

dx=2\sqrt{x}dt

now we need our integration in terms of 1 variable, so

t=\sqrt{x}

thus

\int e^{\sqrt{x}}dx \rightarrow 2\int te^{t}dt

now we do integration by parts.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
ricekrispie said:
what would dv be?
no, the last step was a simple substitution ... this next step we will use parts.
 
  • #19
wait.. i´m confused... now i have \sqrt{x} as u
and then i have to square it?
 
Last edited:
  • #20
2\int te^{t}dt

\begin{array}{cc}u=t & dV=e^{t}dt \\ du=dt & V=e^{t}\end{array}

i'm sure you can take it from here! (judging from your other post)
 
  • #21
omg i´m sorry hehe
where did u get the t from?
 
  • #22
oh my god.. nevermind... i got it
 
  • #23
i didn´t read your other post! thankss hehehe :smile:
 
  • #24
ricekrispie said:
i didn´t read your other post! thankss hehehe :smile:
i just updated it again, idk why i squared it. lol sorry, it's not supposed to be squared.

at times you will need to square it, but not in this situation. (you could, but you'll get the same result which is a waste of time)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K