How to Find the Ka of an Acid from pH and Titration Data?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the Ka of the acid from the given titration data, the pH of the resulting solution after mixing the neutralized solution and the remaining acid must be analyzed. The pH of 3.35 indicates a concentration of H+ ions, which can be calculated using the formula [H+] = 10^(-pH). The equilibrium expression for the dissociation of the acid, represented as HA ⇌ H+ + A-, can be used to relate the concentrations of HA and A- to Ka. By substituting the known values into the equation, the Ka can be derived. This approach effectively utilizes the relationship between pH, concentrations, and the acid dissociation constant.
Jade_punk181
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A solid acid is dissolved in enough water to make 200 mL of a solution. 40.0 mL of the solution is titrated to a phenolphtalein end point with an NaOH solution. The neutralized solution and the remainder of the acid solution are then mixed and the pH of the resulting solution is found to be 3.35. Find the Ka of the acid.by trying to figure out this problem, I assumed that the following formula would come in useful:

((concentration of HA)/(concentration of A-))=volume of acid/volume of base=((concentration of H+)/(Ka))I have attempted this problem, but the equations I had weren't fit for this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After mixing you have a solution containing acid and its conjugate base in known proportions.

--
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top