MHB How to Find the Perpendicular Distance from a Point to a Line?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Perpendicular
AI Thread Summary
To find the perpendicular distance from point P(1, 3) to the line y = (x/2) - 5, start by determining the equation of the line perpendicular to it, which has a slope of -2. Using the point-slope form, the equation of the perpendicular line is y = -2x + 5. To find the intersection of the two lines, set the equations equal: -2x + 5 = (x/2) - 5, and solve for x. Substitute the x-coordinate back into either line's equation to find the corresponding y-coordinate. This process will yield the intersection point needed to calculate the perpendicular distance.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Use the distance formula to find the perpendicular distance from P(1, 3) to the line y = (x/2) - 5.

Any ideas on how to get started?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Use the distance formula to find the perpendicular distance from P(1, 3) to the line y = (x/2) - 5.

Any ideas on how to get started?
Try starting with this.

-Dan
 
RTCNTC said:
Use the distance formula to find the perpendicular distance from P(1, 3) to the line y = (x/2) - 5.

Any ideas on how to get started?

Perpendicular lines have gradients that multiply to give -1, so the gradient of the line you are looking for is -2. You know that (1, 3) lies on this line, so

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} y - 3 &= -2 \left( x - 1 \right) \\ y - 3 &= -2\,x + 2\\ y &= -2\,x + 5 \end{align*}$

And now you want to know where $\displaystyle \begin{align*} y = -2\,x + 5 \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} y = \frac{x}{2} - 5 \end{align*}$ intersect, so that you can work out the distance between this point and P(1, 3).
 
Prove It said:
Perpendicular lines have gradients that multiply to give -1, so the gradient of the line you are looking for is -2. You know that (1, 3) lies on this line, so

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} y - 3 &= -2 \left( x - 1 \right) \\ y - 3 &= -2\,x + 2\\ y &= -2\,x + 5 \end{align*}$

And now you want to know where $\displaystyle \begin{align*} y = -2\,x + 5 \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} y = \frac{x}{2} - 5 \end{align*}$ intersect, so that you can work out the distance between this point and P(1, 3).

To find where the two lines meet, do I set the equations equal to each other?
 
RTCNTC said:
To find where the two lines meet, do I set the equations equal to each other?

Yes, set:

$$-2x+5=\frac{x}{2}-5$$

and solve for $x$ to get the $x$-coordinate of the intersection point. Then plug this value for $x$ into either line (doesn't matter which as they will give the same $y$ value) to get the $y$-coordinate. :D
 
MarkFL said:
Yes, set:

$$-2x+5=\frac{x}{2}-5$$

and solve for $x$ to get the $x$-coordinate of the intersection point. Then plug this value for $x$ into either line (doesn't matter which as they will give the same $y$ value) to get the $y$-coordinate. :D

I can do it. Thanks.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top