How to Find the Potential Energy of a Cloud?

AI Thread Summary
To find the potential energy of a cloud, the maximum electric field is given as 3x10^6 Vm^-1, with a distance of 1000 meters to Earth. The potential difference can be calculated using the formula V=Ed, where E is the electric field and d is the distance. The discussion highlights that the second formula for energy stored in an electric field is unnecessary for this problem, as the electric field value is already provided. It is emphasized that the potential difference can be directly calculated without needing to derive the electric field again. The solution approach is clarified, focusing on the correct application of the given equations.
boneill3
Messages
126
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Assuming the maximum electric field sustained by dry air in a cloud is 3x10^6 Vm^-1
And a distanceof 1000 meters between Earth and cloud. The cloud is 4km long and 1 km wide. ausume uniform eletric field. Find the potential difference.

Homework Equations


V=Ed
\mu = \frac{1}{2}(\epsilon_{0}\times E^2)


The Attempt at a Solution



\mu = \frac{1}{2}(\epsilon_{0}\times E^2)
3\times 10^6 = \frac{1}{2}(8.85\times 10^-12\times E^2)
E=\sqrt{\frac{3\times 10^6}{\frac{1}{2}(8.85\times10^-12\timesE^2)}}
E = 8.23\times10^8

using V=Ed
E = 8.23\times10^8 \times 1000
=8.23x10^11 volts


is this right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
boneill3 said:

Homework Equations


V=Ed
\mu = \frac{1}{2}(\epsilon_{0}\times E^2)

You don't need the second formula (which is for the energy stored in an electric field, I believe. The first equation, along with the given information, should be enough to solve the problem.

boneill3 said:
\mu = \frac{1}{2}(\epsilon_{0}\times E^2)
3\times 10^6 = \frac{1}{2}(8.85\times 10^-12\times E^2)

Why have you plugged in the value of the electric field, E, for mu? The electric field, E, is already given to you. You don't need to solve for it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top