How to Integrate g(x)=∫ƒ(t) dt from -5 to x | Homework Help

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the integral function g(x) defined as g(x)=∫ƒ(t) dt from -5 to x, where the piecewise function ƒ(t) is given. The participants correctly determined g(-8) = 0 and g(-4) = 5 using the fundamental theorem of calculus. However, confusion arose regarding the calculations for g(0) and g(4). The correct approach involves evaluating the integrals separately for the defined intervals of the piecewise function, leading to g(0) being the sum of two integrals: one positive and one negative, while g(4) follows a similar evaluation process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the fundamental theorem of calculus
  • Knowledge of piecewise functions
  • Ability to compute definite integrals
  • Familiarity with graphing functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to evaluate definite integrals of piecewise functions
  • Study the fundamental theorem of calculus in detail
  • Practice sketching graphs of piecewise functions
  • Explore applications of integrals in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those working on integral calculus and piecewise functions, as well as educators seeking to clarify the fundamental theorem of calculus.

romeIAM
Messages
8
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


http://s23.postimg.org/wsj9e91wb/IMG_1334.jpg[/B]
photo of the problem

g(x)=∫ƒ(t) dt from -5 to x

ƒ(t) = (0 if x < -5
5 if -5≤x<-1
-3 if -1≤≤x<3
0 if x≥3)

(a) g(-8) = 0
(b) g(-4) = 5
(c) g(0) = ?
(d) g(4) = ?

Homework Equations



∫ƒ(x) from a to b = (f'(b)-f'(a))
fundamental theorem of calculus

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I was able to get that g(-8) = 0 because plugging -8 into the upper limit and meant x was less than -1 and gave me with f(t) equaling 0 and the anti derivative of 0 is 0. Now i got g(-4) = 5 because the antiderivative of 5 is 5x and plugging in -4 → x and -5→x got me 5. However when i do the same for c and i get -15 by plugging in 0 to x making the f(t) = -3 . The last 0 i thought the anti derivative of 0 is 0 but it doesn't take either of those answers. I need guidence.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
romeIAM said:

Homework Statement


http://s23.postimg.org/wsj9e91wb/IMG_1334.jpg[/B]
photo of the problem

g(x)=∫ƒ(t) dt from -5 to x

ƒ(t) = (0 if x < -5
5 if -5≤x<-1
-3 if -1≤≤x<3
0 if x≥3)

(a) g(-8) = 0
(b) g(-4) = 5
(c) g(0) = ?
(d) g(4) = ?

Homework Equations



∫ƒ(x) from a to b = (f'(b)-f'(a))
fundamental theorem of calculus
This is NOT what the FTC says!
romeIAM said:

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I was able to get that g(-8) = 0 because plugging -8 into the upper limit and meant x was less than -1 and gave me with f(t) equaling 0 and the anti derivative of 0 is 0. Now i got g(-4) = 5 because the antiderivative of 5 is 5x and plugging in -4 → x and -5→x got me 5. However when i do the same for c and i get -15 by plugging in 0 to x making the f(t) = -3 . The last 0 i thought the anti derivative of 0 is 0 but it doesn't take either of those answers. I need guidence.
Much better! Thank you.

Sketch the graph, if you haven't already done so. If you have the graph, this is a very simple problem.
For c) g(0) = ##\int_{-5}^{-1} f(t)dt + \int_{-1}^0 f(t)dt##
The first integral is positive, since the graph of f is above the horizontal axis. The second integral is negative, because the graph is below the hor. axis.

For d), the approach is similar.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K