How to Interpret Missing Energy Levels in Atomic Spectra?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Clara Chung
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atomic Spectrum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on interpreting missing energy levels in atomic spectra, particularly in relation to multi-electron atoms and quantum defect theory. Participants highlight the importance of the Rydberg constant and the principal quantum number in calculations, noting that the equation for ionization energy is empirical and complex. A key point is that the wavenumbers provided in the spectrum are linked to energy levels rather than transitions, which allows for the calculation of quantum defects. There is consensus that additional information is necessary to fully solve the problem, particularly regarding the spectrum. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in distinguishing between energy levels and transitions when analyzing atomic spectra.
Clara Chung
Messages
300
Reaction score
13
Homework Statement
Attached below
Relevant Equations
Attached below
241272

241289

I drew a picture of the information in the problem (not sure if it is right), the red lines are the given values and green line can be calculated using the formula given. I don't know how to find the defects because the energy from 100d to 100g is missing...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think ## E_{ion}=-\frac{Z^2 R}{n^2} ##, (where ## R ## is the Rydberg constant) and for hydrogen, ## Z=1 ## (atomic number) and ## R_M=0 ##. I would need to do a little googling, which you perhaps should do on this one, but this equation is highly empirical, and not nearly as straightforward as the Bohr atom model for the hydrogen atom.
Incidentally, ## n ## is the principal quantum number. You might consult an advanced spectroscopy textbook to find out what they call the other constants in this formula.
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
Charles Link said:
I think ## E_{ion}=-\frac{Z^2 R}{n^2} ##, (where ## R ## is the Rydberg constant) and for hydrogen, ## Z=1 ## (atomic number) and ## R_M=0 ##.
That won't work here. This question is about multi-electron atoms and quantum defect theory, so a quantum defect must be present in the equation. Also, ##R_M## is the Rydberg constant for a given isotope, so it can't be equal to zero.

@Clara Chung: I don't know how you can solve this problem. I agree with you that there appears to be some information missing. Can you post the spectrum that goes with the question?
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung and Charles Link
DrClaude said:
That won't work here. This question is about multi-electron atoms and quantum defect theory, so a quantum defect must be present in the equation. Also, ##R_M## is the Rydberg constant for a given isotope, so it can't be equal to zero.

@Clara Chung: I don't know how you can solve this problem. I agree with you that there appears to be some information missing. Can you post the spectrum that goes with the question?
241312

I am so sorry that I forgot to post the spectrum in the question... Here is it...
 
It appears that the wavenumbers given in the spectrum are related to the energies of the levels, not to the transitions. In that case, there are no unknowns and you should be able to calculate the quantum defects.
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
DrClaude said:
It appears that the wavenumbers given in the spectrum are related to the energies of the levels, not to the transitions. In that case, there are no unknowns and you should be able to calculate the quantum defects.
Why is it the energies of the levels¿ the question says from 3p to the 100 levels...
 
Clara Chung said:
Why is it the energies of the levels¿ the question says from 3p to the 100 levels...
I interpreted this the same as you initially, but looking at the numbers given, the only way for this to make sense is to consider that these are energy levels, not transitions (compare to the energy level given for 100g).
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
Back
Top