How to intuitively see the v^2 relation to kinetic energy?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between velocity (v) and kinetic energy (KE), specifically that KE is proportional to v^2, as expressed in the formula KE = 1/2 m*v^2. Participants explore intuitive ways to visualize this quadratic relationship, emphasizing that the power required to accelerate an object increases with its speed. They also discuss momentum (p = mv) and its linear relationship with velocity, contrasting it with the quadratic nature of kinetic energy. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding these concepts through everyday observations, such as car collisions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, including kinetic energy and momentum.
  • Familiarity with the equations KE = 1/2 m*v^2 and p = mv.
  • Knowledge of the relationship between force, work, and power.
  • Basic comprehension of the implications of velocity in physical interactions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of kinetic energy from work-energy principles.
  • Explore the implications of momentum conservation in collisions.
  • Study the differences between linear and quadratic relationships in physics.
  • Investigate the role of mass in kinetic energy and momentum calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the intuitive aspects of kinetic energy and momentum in real-world scenarios.

ForTheGreater
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
KE is proportional to v^2. In a gravitational field KE=1/2 m*v^2.
It's easy to find mathematically Work=Fd=mad=m(v/t)(v*t)=m*v^2.

But how to visualize it or get an intuitively "feel" for this v^2 relationship?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The amount of power it takes to push something is equal to how hard you push times how fast you push. So far that's pretty intuitive right?

Accelerating something that's moving fast requires me to push fast.
Accelerating something that's moving slow requires that I push slow.

If I push equally hard on the fast thing and the slow thing, then I'll put more power into the fast thing, so, it will be accumulating more kinetic energy while accelerating at the same rate.
 
mrspeedybob said:
If I push equally hard on the fast thing and the slow thing, then I'll put more power into the fast thing, so, it will be accumulating more kinetic energy while accelerating at the same rate.

Yes, thank you.

Funny you should respond today. I was thinking about this again today and I reason as such that momentum is m*v and the rate at which momentum is traveling is (m*v)*v which is kinetic energy. I like the way you put it very much too.
 
There is a completely different way to approach a semi-intuitive understanding that agrees with everyday observations.

Consider two cars colliding while traveling 60 mph. If they were traveling in the same direction, the consequences are very different than if they were traveling in opposite directions. Thus, momentum has a +- sign. ##v^1## has a +- sign.

Consider the energy needed to accelerate a car to 60 mph. You could measure that by the fuel consumed during acceleration. The fuel needed is always positive regardless of the +- orientation of the drag strip. ##v^2## is always positive.

Using these arguments, momentum must be proportional to an odd power of v and energy proportional to an even power of v. 1 and 2 are the smallest (simplest) nonzero powers that fit. If you always guess the simplest possible solution, you will nearly always be correct.

Therefore, based only what you observe at the drag strip, your intuition should make you guess ##v^2## for K.E. and ##v^1## for momentum. Further search of your intuitive knowledge of car collisions (based on watching Mythbusters on TV) should lead you to conclude that both momentum and K.E. must also be proportional to mass.

##p=mv## and ##K.E.=mv^2## can be completely intuitive without studying physics. Do you agree?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: physics user1
Good Definitions are a good place to start.
##Work=\int v dp## is a very general definition.
Now use p=mv. Then work = the change in kinetic energy. The important factor of 1/2 shows up.

The same definition works in special relativity... but you don't get a quadratic relation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: physics user1

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K