How to Isolate Trigger Signals for Multiple Lasers and a Camera?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laser Signal
AI Thread Summary
To isolate trigger signals for two lasers and a camera, a Tee junction is not recommended as it causes cross-triggering between the lasers. Instead, a method of isolation is needed to ensure that the signal from one laser does not trigger the other. Clarification on the voltage output from the pulse generator and the camera's triggering requirements is necessary for a suitable solution. Maintaining separate circuits for each laser is essential to prevent unwanted activation. Proper isolation will ensure accurate operation of the system.
thh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone!

I have a system with 2 lasers and a single camera. I have two trigger inputs going to each laser, they have a delay of minimum 350ms. These triggers are split and need to be connected to the camera to open it whenever the lasers fire. So i thought of a Tee junction where i will have both the laser triggers coming in and a single output to the camera. Now the problem with this arrangement is that when laser 1 is triggered, the signal will go to the camera and also laser 2, due to the Tee, which will cause it to fire. How do i stop the signal from laser1 trigger from going to the laser 2 trigger and vice versa? I have attached an image of the arrangement.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank You
Thh
 

Attachments

  • Setup.jpg
    Setup.jpg
    8.7 KB · Views: 452
Engineering news on Phys.org
You need to keep the circuits separate. You "thought of a tee" now you are asking how to avoid the disadvantage of a tee. Don't use a tee.

Either that, or I am totally misunderstanding your question.
 
We need an easy method of isolation. Can you say what voltage is coming out of the pulse gen and what the camera requires to trigger?
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top