MHB How to know if plane is perpendicular to another plane?

AI Thread Summary
To determine if a plane is perpendicular to the z-axis, one must use the normal vector, which for the z-axis is <0, 0, 1>. A plane perpendicular to this axis can be expressed as 0x + 0y + 1z = C, simplifying to z = C for any constant C. For a line perpendicular to the equation 2x + 3y = 6, first identify the slope, which is -2/3; the perpendicular slope will be 3/2. The resulting line equation can be expressed as y = (3/2)x + 2 or transformed into standard form as 2y - 3x = 2. Understanding normal vectors and slopes is crucial for establishing perpendicular relationships in both planes and lines.
nicole1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The question that I'm trying to answer states "Make a vector equation of a plane that is perpendicular to the z axis." How do i ensure its perpendicular? How do i start this equation?

Another question similar to this that i am also struggling states "What is the vector equation of a 2D line that is perpendicular to this line: 2x + 3y = 6 though the lines y intercept?"

Any help for both of these questions would be greatly appreciated!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
nicole said:
The question that I'm trying to answer states "Make a vector equation of a plane that is perpendicular to the z axis." How do i ensure its perpendicular? How do i start this equation?

Another question similar to this that i am also struggling states "What is the vector equation of a 2D line that is perpendicular to this line: 2x + 3y = 6 though the lines y intercept?"

Any help for both of these questions would be greatly appreciated!

Find a NORMAL VECTOR to the Planes. If they are orthogonal, you're done.

Rather the same deal for the lines. Compare the slopes.
 
Any plane can be written in the form Ax+ By+ Cz= D for constants A, B, C, and D. And then <A, B, C> is a vector normal (perpendicular) to that plane.

The z-axis has "unit direction vector" <0, 0, 1>. A plane perpendicular to it must have that as "normal vector" and so the equation of the plane can be taken as 0x+ 0y+ 1z= z= C for some constant C.

The line 2x+ 3y= 6 has y-intercept (0, 2) (the y-intercept of a line is the point where it crosses the y-axis so x= 0). Further, if we were to "solve" that equation for y, 3y= 6- 2x, so y= 2- (2/3)x. That shows, again, that the y-intercept is 2 and that the slope is -2/3. A line perpendicular to the given line must have slope 3/2. Any (non-vertical) line can be written in the form y= mx+ b where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept. A line with slope 3/2 and y-intercept 2 is y= (3/2)x+ 2. If you don't like fractions, multiply by 2 to get 2y= 3x+ 2 which can be written in the same form as the line was originally given as 2y- 3x= 2.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top