How to Make a Vertical Stabilizer for a Model Space Shuttle Discovery

  • Thread starter Thread starter dlgoff
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discovery Space
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the construction of a vertical stabilizer for a model of the Space Shuttle Discovery, including details about the model's features and historical context. Participants share insights about the model's design, components, and personal experiences with similar models.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • One participant shares a picture of a battery-operated model of the Space Shuttle Discovery, noting it is missing its vertical stabilizer.
  • Another participant corrects the first by stating that the shuttle Discovery first flew in 1983, not in the 1960s.
  • Questions arise about the model's features, specifically whether the bay doors open and if there is a movable mechanical arm.
  • Participants discuss the presence of elevons on the model and whether it is damaged, with one later retracting their question after realizing a misunderstanding.
  • A participant provides historical context about the Canadarm, detailing its integration into the shuttle program and its operational history.
  • One participant describes their process of creating the vertical stabilizer, including challenges faced in finding accurate designs and the method used to create it.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the historical details of the Space Shuttle Discovery and its features, but there are disagreements regarding the model's condition and features, as well as the timeline of the shuttle's first flight. The discussion remains unresolved on certain technical aspects of the model.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the model's features and condition, and there are references to missing assumptions regarding the model's design and historical accuracy.

dlgoff
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,458
Reaction score
3,265
I hope it's appropriate to post a picture of a battery operated model of the Space Shuttle Discovery which flew in the 1960's ; lights and sounds.

I came across it at the antique mall. It's missing it's vertical stabilizer, but I can make that,

IMG_3327.JPG


NASA 1.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron and berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
The shuttle Discovery first flew in 1983. Fun model!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff
Do the Bay Doors open and the mechanical arm can come out?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff
berkeman said:
Do the Bay Doors open and the mechanical arm can come out?
The doors do open but no movable arm. Then landing gears, wheels & nose, can be pulled down out of their compartments.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
dlgoff said:
The doors do open but no movable arm.
So I predict you will be building more than just the vertical stabilizer! :cool:
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff
hutchphd said:
The shuttle Discovery first flew in 1983. Fun model!
I remember it well. What an accomplishment.
 
berkeman said:
So I predict you will be building more than just the vertical stabilizer! :cool:
You know me too well. :olduhh:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
dlgoff said:
I hope it's appropriate to post a picture of a battery operated model of the Space Shuttle Discovery which flew in the 1960's ; lights and sounds.

I came across it at the antique mall. It's missing it's vertical stabilizer, but I can make that,

View attachment 273260
I see two elevons in the photo. Is the model damaged or built with reentry elevons?

The wing leading edge tiles in black are a nice touch.

[edit: I retract my question. Misunderstood OP. Thanks.]
 
Last edited:
Klystron said:
I see two elevons in the photo. Is the model damaged or built with reentry elevons?

The wing leading edge tiles in black are a nice touch.
I don't know what you are seeing. There's no damage. Are you maybe seeing the slightly visible landing gears? As they are in the down and locked position.
 
  • #10
There was one Canadian Arm, which was swapped around to all the Shuttles
...
Ah, here we go:
The Canadarm was signed over to NASA in February 1981, at Spar's Toronto plant, where it was built. After being carefully trucked to the Kennedy Space Center, it was integrated into the space shuttle Columbia in June.

The Canadarm’s first flight was with the space shuttle Columbia on 13 November 1981. Columbia was the second of NASA’s shuttle missions (also known as STS-2).

It performed well and exceeded all design goals. Between 1981 and its final flight in 2011, the Canadarm flew 90 times. In addition to Columbia, its flight history included missions with all of NASA’s other shuttles: Challenger, Discovery, Atlantis and Endeavour.


(from: https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/canadarm)

Cheers,
Tom
 
  • Informative
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff and berkeman
  • #11
dlgoff said:
It's missing it's vertical stabilizer, but I can make that,
Making the vertical stabilizer was harder than I thought. I had no idea what it even looked like, but after searching for drawings, etc, I used this drawing to capture the stabilizer:

orbiter_drawing-2.gif


I then rescaled it and printed it onto a sheet of decal paper. I put the decal on a plastic piece cut to the correct size. Then with a little paint:

smallIMG_3353.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
10K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
37
Views
15K
Replies
78
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K