How to make physics problem simpler

  • Thread starter Thread starter asf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
Understanding complex problems requires more than just grasping concepts and diagrams; it involves identifying the relevant concepts to apply. To tackle difficult problems, breaking them down into simpler components can be effective. Analyzing extreme scenarios can also clarify the problem's intricacies. A recommended approach is to carefully read the problem and create diagrams, as this initial step can spark ideas. Writing down all relevant equations, focusing on logical deductions rather than memorization, is crucial. This method emphasizes the importance of translating logical thoughts into mathematical language, which is essential in physics. Additionally, practicing simpler problems can build foundational skills, although advanced courses often lack adequate preparatory material. Online resources and alternative textbooks can provide valuable support for mastering challenging concepts.
asf
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Just knowing the concept and being able to get the diagram properly doesn't give any clue to solve difficult problems. Question paper having full of conceptual question rather than more likely to solve it are quite difficult. Any one kindly suggest some idea to tackle it.

I appreciate for those sparing time in this. [TH]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sometimes the trick is being able to identify which concepts you need to apply in order to figure the problem out.

One thing that I find helps is to try to reduced a difficult problem into something simpler. Or look at extreme scenarios where the outcome may be a little more intuitive to predict. This can at least help you to isolate the particular part of the problem that you're having difficulty with.
 
First thing to do is to carefully read the problems and draw whatever you can. Its often that first step of doodling in your paper that can make you start the problem instead of staring blankly at it for minutes.

What you should do next is start writing down every single equation (these should be equations of logic not memorization) that you can think of along with your drawn diagram. For example if your calculating something as simple as the vector sum of two vectors than you should start writing down some mathematical truths as you go along the way or if you like at the very beginning:

f=f1+f2
f1x=f1cosθ
f1y=f1sinθ
f2x=f2cosθ
f2y=f2sinθ
f1= square root (f1x^2+f1y^2)
f2= square root (f2x^2+f2y^2)

Of course this is a relatively simple problem, but I mean to show the concept of what you should be doing. You should do your best to logically deduce certain mathematical truths along your problem. And its these mathematical truths that will help you solve the problem. Remember, the language of physics is written in mathematics, therefore what you need to do is transform your logical thoughts to a mathematical language. Mathematics is very powerful, if you can transform life around you to mathematics then you are powerful indeed. ^.^:cool:
 
In my experience the best way to make hard problems more simple is to solve a few simpler problems before . This is easy to do in early course where textbooks have lots of simple problems and the hard problems are at the end.In more advanced courses it becomes harder because of crap textbooks, with 10 really hard problems at the end of a 40 page chapter with no examples. I don't understand how they expect to handle those problems without first letting you get a basic understanding of the tools used to solve them or even giving you a clue of what those tools may be.Fortunately you can find a lot of material that can help you online and in other books..
 
Thank you for your helpful words
I try to go on with it.
Thank you once again.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top