How to measure electric field with a network analyzer?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the measurement of electric fields using a network analyzer (NA) in conjunction with antennas. Participants explore the relationship between S-parameters, specifically S21, and the electric field's magnitude and phase, considering both theoretical and practical aspects of the measurement process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes using a network analyzer to measure S-parameters of two connected antennas, proposing that S21 can provide insights into the electric field received by the second antenna.
  • Another participant cautions that S21 reflects the combined effect of the antennas and does not directly indicate the fields between them without proper characterization or calibration.
  • A participant questions whether the antennas are sufficiently spaced to be in the far field, suggesting that the drive level of the transmitting antenna could help in determining the electric field strength at the receiving antenna.
  • It is noted that S-parameters represent ratios of voltages or electric fields, and measuring absolute electric field strength may require additional equipment like a power meter or spectrum analyzer.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the calibration of antennas and seeks clarification on how to convert measurements from the network analyzer to electric field values.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need for the Antenna Factor (AF) to relate voltage measurements to electric field strength, but raises concerns about the limitations of this approach regarding phase information.
  • A later reply highlights the difficulty in accurately measuring phase due to cable effects, particularly at high frequencies, complicating the extraction of precise electric field values.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of using S21 to measure electric fields, with some suggesting it can provide useful information while others argue that additional calibration and characterization are necessary. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to obtain electric field measurements from the network analyzer data.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions, such as the distance between antennas affecting the measurement (far vs. near field) and the need for specific calibration techniques. There are also unresolved questions about the conversion of voltage measurements to electric field values, particularly concerning phase information and the limitations of using S-parameters alone.

squalho
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello,

This is my problem: I have a network analyzer, that is capable of measuring the S-parameters of a 2 ports network. Let's say that I connect antenna #1 (a standard half-wavelength dipole) to port #1 of the NA, and antenna #2 (same type of dipole) to port #2 of the network analyzer. Cinsidering only 1, fixed frequency, S11 tells me about the reflection coefficient of antenna #1 and S22 the same for antenna #2. S21 (or S12, they should be the same) would give me an idea of how much power goes from port 1 to port 2 (or viceversa) for that specific frequency, i.e. it should allow me to measure the electric field received by antenna #2, in both magnitude and phase.

I know that S21 is somewhat proportional to the electric field, because its magnitude decreases as I go farther, and its phase changes with the position too, showing 360 degrees changes for every wavelength of distance between the antennas.

So my question is: given S21, in both magnitude and phase, how can I find E, magnitude and phase?

Any suggestion is greatly appreciated!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If you have two antennae (transmit and receive) then S21 will only show the combined effect. It won't actually tell you what's going on with the fields in between unless you can characterise / calibrate the antennae fully, first.
 
squalho said:
Hello,

This is my problem: I have a network analyzer, that is capable of measuring the S-parameters of a 2 ports network. Let's say that I connect antenna #1 (a standard half-wavelength dipole) to port #1 of the NA, and antenna #2 (same type of dipole) to port #2 of the network analyzer. Cinsidering only 1, fixed frequency, S11 tells me about the reflection coefficient of antenna #1 and S22 the same for antenna #2. S21 (or S12, they should be the same) would give me an idea of how much power goes from port 1 to port 2 (or viceversa) for that specific frequency, i.e. it should allow me to measure the electric field received by antenna #2, in both magnitude and phase.

I know that S21 is somewhat proportional to the electric field, because its magnitude decreases as I go farther, and its phase changes with the position too, showing 360 degrees changes for every wavelength of distance between the antennas.

So my question is: given S21, in both magnitude and phase, how can I find E, magnitude and phase?

Any suggestion is greatly appreciated!

Are your antennas far enough apart that the RX antenna is in the far field of the TX antenna?

If you can set the drive level for your TX antenna, then you should be able to read off the RX level, which can be converted into the equivalent E-field.
 
S parameters is a ratio between two voltages, or ratio between two electric fields.

If you want to measure absolute 'electric field' you need to measure power with either a power meter or a spectrum analyzer.
 
Thanks everybody for your answers. Addressing them one by one:

sophiecentaur: what do you mean with caracterize/calibrate the antennas? I can calibrate the cables up to the last connection before the antenna, but I don't think that's what you mean. Can you be more specific?

what: I have a spectrum analyzer, but it only tells me the power (i.e. magnitude square) of the field, while I'm interested in magnitude and phase (complex phasor).

berkemen: The antennas are at any distance, they could be far or near field. I can set the level of TX and I'm guessing I can read the level of the RX. Do you mean reading magnitude and phase of the ports A, B, R? How do I go from that to E_rx=magnitude+phase [V/m] ? Just using the impedance of the antenna?
 
squalho said:
berkemen: The antennas are at any distance, they could be far or near field. I can set the level of TX and I'm guessing I can read the level of the RX. Do you mean reading magnitude and phase of the ports A, B, R? How do I go from that to E_rx=magnitude+phase [V/m] ? Just using the impedance of the antenna?

It would have to be in the far field, and you would need to have the Antenna Factor (AF) graph of the antenna versus frequency (which you could get from the antenna manufacturer, or maybe calculate for yourself for standard antenna geometries). The conversion is about 1/2 way down this page:

http://www.radioing.com/eengineer/convert.html

.
 
I understand the antenna factor relationship, but I don't think it's what I'm looking for.

First of all, that relation involves AF (suppose I know it from the manufacturer), E (what I want to find) and V (voltage at the output of the antenna). So none of that information is something that I can get from the network analyzer, that is my goal.

Second: that relation does not work with complex quantities, because the antenna factor is in terms of magnitude only (usually expressed in dB), i.e. I don't know what the antenna does to the phase of the signal.

Third: even giving up the NA and just trying to measure the voltage with an oscilloscope let's say, I can't measure V in both magnitude and phase easily: let's say I work at 3GHz, every 10cm of cable add me a 360 degrees rotation in the phase, so I will never be able to know precisely the phase exactly at the output of the antenna.

Does that makes sense?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K