How to measure the tangential component of velocity of receding starsor quasars?

AI Thread Summary
To measure the tangential component of velocity for receding stars or quasars, one must consider that redshift only provides the radial component of velocity. Nearby stars exhibit individual motion with both radial and tangential components, which can be measured by tracking their positions over time and applying trigonometry to calculate the angle of movement. In contrast, recession speed due to cosmic expansion, as described by General Relativity, is purely radial and lacks a tangential component. While distant receding objects may have some individual proper motion, it is typically negligible compared to their recession speed. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurate measurements in astrophysics.
aniketp
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
How to measure the tangential component of velocity of receding starsor quasars?
I ask this because the velocity determined by observing the red shift will give only the radial component...
Thnx for replying...
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
aniketp said:
Hi all,
How to measure the tangential component of velocity of receding starsor quasars?
I ask this because the velocity determined by observing the red shift will give only the radial component...
Thnx for replying...

nearby stars, like in our galaxy, are not receding from us as part of the general expansion. they just have their own individual motion, with radial and tangential components

tangential velocity of nearby stars in our galaxy can be measured by comparing positions over the course of many years
one figures out the distance to the thing, and one measures the tiny angle it moves per year, and uses trig. (multiply the distance times the angle in radians rate of change)

recession speed----that due to the expansion of distances a la General Relativity----is different from usual velocity. It only has a radial component. There is no tangential component to measure

a distant receding object can also have some individual proper motion. But this is often small compared with recession speed and may even be neglected.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top