How to prove derivative of Airy function

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jostpuur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative Function
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivative of the Airy function, specifically how to prove its derivative and the second derivative. Participants explore various mathematical approaches, including integration techniques and complex analysis, while addressing the challenges associated with the convergence of integrals involved.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the definition of the Airy function and proposes a form for its derivative, expressing uncertainty about the validity of interchanging limits and integration.
  • Another participant suggests using complex analysis and Jordan's lemma to simplify the problem, implying that this approach could make the proof straightforward.
  • A participant raises a question about the applicability of a known rule for differentiating under the integral sign, noting that it may not be applicable in this case due to convergence issues.
  • Another participant agrees that the rule may only yield a formal result and emphasizes the necessity of ensuring the right-hand side exists before applying it.
  • A later post discusses the rotation of integration domains for complex integrals, detailing how to handle the integrals for the Airy function in the complex plane.
  • One participant mentions that the Airy function satisfies a specific differential equation, indicating a connection to the broader mathematical context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of certain mathematical techniques and the conditions under which they can be applied. There is no consensus on the best approach to proving the derivative or the second derivative of the Airy function.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the integrals involved do not converge absolutely and rely on cancellation of oscillations, which complicates the proof. The discussion highlights the dependence on specific assumptions regarding the behavior of the integrands.

jostpuur
Messages
2,112
Reaction score
19
The Airy function is defined as follows:

[tex] \textrm{Ai}(x) = \frac{1}{\pi}\int\limits_0^{\infty} \cos\big(\frac{1}{3}t^3 + xt\big)dt[/tex]

It seems pretty probable, that its derivative is this:

[tex] \textrm{Ai}'(x) = -\frac{1}{\pi}\int\limits_0^{\infty} t\sin\big(\frac{1}{3}t^3 + xt\big)dt[/tex]

I'm interested to know how this result is proven. It's not as simple as it might seem on quick glance. Only thing that's trivial is this:

[tex] \textrm{Ai}'(x) = \lim_{\Delta x\to 0}\frac{1}{\pi}\int\limits_0^{\infty}<br /> \frac{\cos\big(\frac{1}{3}t^3 + (x+\Delta x)t\big) - \cos\big(\frac{1}{3}t^3 + xt\big)}{\Delta x}dt<br /> = -\lim_{\Delta x\to 0}\frac{1}{\pi}\int\limits_0^{\infty} t\sin\big(\frac{1}{3}t^3 + (x+\xi_{t,\Delta x})t\big) dt[/tex]

Where [itex]|\xi_{t,\Delta x}|\leq |\Delta x|[/itex]. So the non-trivial task is to prove that the order of limit and integration can be changed. The integral does not converge absolutely, but instead relies on cancellation of accelerating oscillations. If we have no better knowledge about [itex]\xi_{t,\Delta x}[/itex], it could behave in such manner that it starts picking more positive parts of the integrand than negative parts, and have surprising effect on the value of the integral.EDIT 1:

At first I thought it would be simple thing to prove that

[tex] \textrm{Ai}''(x) = x\textrm{Ai}(x)[/tex]

after it has been shown that the derivative and integral can be commuted, but actually that's not the only problem. If I assume that I can commute [itex]D_x^2[/itex] with the integral, I get the following:

[tex] \textrm{Ai}''(x) = -\frac{1}{\pi}\int\limits_0^{\infty} t^2\cos\big(\frac{1}{3}t^3 + xt\big)dt<br /> = -\frac{1}{\pi}\int\limits_0^{\infty}\Big( D_t\sin\big(\frac{1}{3}t^3 + xt\big) \;-\; x\cos\big(\frac{1}{3}t^3 + xt\big)\Big)dt[/tex]

But [itex]\lim_{t\to\infty}\sin(\frac{1}{3}t^3 + xt)[/itex] does not exist and is not zero, so actually we can't conclude that the integral of the derivative would be zero. So how do you compute the second derivative then?

EDIT 2:

hmhmh... I just noticed that

[tex] \int\limits_0^{\infty} t^{\alpha} \cos\big(\frac{1}{3}t^3 + xt\big)dt = \frac{1}{3}\int\limits_0^{\infty} u^{(\alpha - 2)/3} \cos\big(\frac{1}{3}u + xu^{1/3}\big) du[/tex]

seems to converge only when [itex]-1 < \alpha < 2[/itex], and diverges for [itex]2 \leq \alpha[/itex].
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use some complex analysis. I.e, use a variant of Jordan's lemma to rotate the contour in the complex plane so that the integrand converges exponentially. The problem then becomes trivial.
 
It is generally true that
[tex]\frac{d}{dx}\int_a^b f(x,t)dt= \int_a^b \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} dt[/tex]

Are you allowed to use that or is that part of what you are trying to prove?
 
An application of that rule could only give us a formal result, because it is not clear that the right hand side of your expression exists in this case. If the derivative were dominated by some integrable function, we could apply your result, but we can't do that here.

However, if we first rotate the contour slightly (using a Jordan's lemma type argument) then our integrand converges exponentially and we can apply your result. :)
 
[tex] \textrm{Ai}(x) = \frac{1}{\pi}\int\limits_0^{\infty} \cos\big(\frac{1}{3}t^3 + xt\big) dt<br /> = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int\limits_0^{\infty} e^{i(\frac{1}{3}t^3 + xt)}dt<br /> \;+\;\frac{1}{2\pi} \int\limits_0^{\infty} e^{-i(\frac{1}{3}t^3 + xt)}dt[/tex]

So... the domains of integration should be rotated counter clockwise for the first integrand, and clockwise for the second integrand. I'll fix some [itex]0<\theta<\frac{\pi}{3}[/itex], and then examine counter clockwise integration domain

[tex] [0,R]\;\cup\; \{Re^{i\phi}\;|\;0\leq\phi\leq\theta\}\;\cup\; \{re^{i\theta}\;|\;0\leq r\leq R\}[/tex]

for the first integrand.

With fixed [itex]\theta[/itex], it is possible to find [itex]a>0[/itex] so that [itex]a\phi \leq \sin(\phi)[/itex] for all [itex]0\leq\phi\leq 3\theta[/itex]. The integral over the arc can be approximated above as follows.

[tex] \Big| \int\limits_0^{\theta} e^{i(\frac{1}{3}R^3e^{3i\phi} + xRe^{i\phi})} Rie^{i\phi} d\phi\Big|<br /> \leq R\int\limits_0^{\theta} e^{-\frac{1}{3}R^3\sin(3\phi) - xR\sin(\phi)}d\phi<br /> \leq R\int\limits_0^{\theta}e^{(-aR^3 + |x|R)\phi} d\phi[/tex]
[tex] = \frac{1}{aR^2 - |x|}\Big(1 - e^{(-aR^3+|x|R)\theta}\Big) \underset{R\to\infty}{\to} 0[/tex]

This means that

[tex] \textrm{Ai}(x) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int\limits_0^{\infty} e^{i(\frac{1}{3}t^3 e^{3i\theta} + xte^{i\theta})} e^{i\theta} dt<br /> \;+\;\frac{1}{2\pi} \int\limits_0^{\infty} e^{-i(\frac{1}{3}t^3e^{-3i\theta} + xte^{-i\theta})} e^{-i\theta} dt[/tex]
[tex] =\frac{1}{\pi}\textrm{Re}\Big( \int\limits_0^{\infty}<br /> e^{\frac{1}{3}t^3(-\sin(3\theta)+i\cos(3\theta)) +xt(-\sin(\theta) + i\cos(\theta)) + i\theta} dt\Big)[/tex]

The rest is clear.-------------

Life is lot easier for those who simply believe Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airy_function

By differentiating under the integration sign, we find that y = Ai(x) satisfies the differential equation
[tex] y'' - xy = 0[/tex]

*sigh!*
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K