How to prove Theta for a incline plane.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the angle of gravity (theta) is the same as the angle of the inclined plane. Participants explain that by drawing force lines from the box on the ramp, two right angles are formed, clarifying the relationship between the angles. The triangle formed at the block includes an angle of 90-θ, leading to the conclusion that the angle at the block is indeed theta. One participant expresses confusion about matching the angles in the triangles but acknowledges the clarity provided by the previous explanation. The conversation emphasizes the geometric relationships that validate the equality of the angles.
aj-smith
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
In physics class, we always assumed both theta's. Can someone prove to me why the angle for gravity is the same as the angle of the inclined plane? I can clearly see that triangles could be created and visually they look similar, but obviously that isn't enough.

Image is in the attachment.

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • slope.png
    slope.png
    3.2 KB · Views: 934
Physics news on Phys.org
If you draw down the lines for force from the point where the box touches the ramp, everything becomes much clearer. Two right angles are created: one at the flat base of the ramp and one at the point where the box touches the ramp. The triangle with the original θ is completed by an angle with value 90-θ. Since the place where the box touches the ramp has a right angle, that is then θ.
 
So just because the triangle at the block is a right angle, the angle closest to the block is considered theta?

I see the part of 90-θ, but how do you match that with the opposing angle to theta in the 2nd triangle to make the assumption that that angle that is at the block is theta?

Sorry that I am not seeing it, yet I must say thanks for the reply.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top