How to Reduce Glare off Water by Factor of 1.33: Polarization Physics Problem

sachi
Messages
63
Reaction score
1
"by what factor may the glare off water be reduced when the sun is at

a) 45 degrees above the horizon
b)60 degrees above the horizon

n.b refractive index of water is 1.33"

I have derived the fresnel reflection coefficients for the cases when E is perpendicular to the plane of incidence, and when E is parallel to the plane of incidence. I am also assuming that "glare" is caused by the E-field. But I'm not sure which reflection coeffient to use i.e do we assume that E is parallel to plane of incidence of perp.?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The E field from the blue sky is predominantly horizontally polarized.
This is because the Rayleigh scattering polarizes the scattered radiation.
The horizontal polarization comes out to be
P=sin^2\theta/(1+cos\theta)^2.
You will have to use both E polarizations at the water surface.
The above factor gives the polarized horizontal E^2. Then you have to include both E polarizations with E^2 = one half of the unpolarized component.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top