How to Show the General Solution to the Poisson Equation?

yeahhyeahyeah
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given that \nabla2 1/r = -4\pi\delta3(r)

show that the solution to the Poisson equation \nabla2\Phi = -(\rho(r)/\epsilon)

can be written:

\Phi(r) = (1/4\pi\epsilon) \int d3r' (\rho(r') / |r - r'|)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the Poisson equation is kind of like a partial differential equation. I rearranged it to \Phirr(r2) + \Phir(2r) = [-\rho(r) * r2 ] / \epsilon

But that wasn't very helpful

Then I also realized that the equations for electric potential is a solution to this... but that is only a special case. Also, is gravitational potential also a solution, or no?

How do you solve this type of equation? What does the 'given': \nabla2 1/r = -4\pi\delta3(r)
even tell me? I am very lost. I read up about Poisson equations and I think the 'given' is like a boundary case... but I don't know how you incorporate the boundary case of a Poisson equation into a solution.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Just take the Laplacian of the proposed solution (Remember, you don't actually have to solve Poisson's equation to show that something is a solution of it)...what do you get?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top