How to Solve a Kinematics Problem Involving Acceleration and Time

  • Thread starter Thread starter Satyr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    1d Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a kinematics problem involving the acceleration of blood in the heart. The initial attempt to calculate acceleration using the formula a = v/t was incorrect due to misunderstanding the relationship between distance and velocity. A second approach using the equation v² = v₀² + 2aΔx was suggested and confirmed as correct. The confusion arose from misapplying the time calculation and not accounting for the non-uniform velocity during acceleration. Ultimately, the correct method yielded the appropriate acceleration value, clarifying the initial errors.
Satyr
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The left ventricle of the heart accelerates blood from rest to a velocity of +26 cm/s. (a) if the displacement of the blood during acceleration is +2.0 cm, determine its acceleration (in cm/s^2). (b) How much time does blood take to reach its final velocity


Homework Equations


V=Vi + at
D=RT
a=v/t


The Attempt at a Solution



I cannot figure out what I am doing wrong with this problem...I have logically approached this from two directions and am getting answers that aren't close to what the book is suggesting. Here's my work:

So I know initial velocity is 0 and final velocity is 26 cm/s. I know the displacement (delta x) is 2 and am looking for acceleration...a=v/t; t= D/R = (2cm/26cm/s) = .0769 seconds to travel those 2 centimeters. Since I now have t (just solved for it) and was given the final velocity to begin with, I can plug it into a=v/t to yield 26/.0769 = 338 m/s^2. This approach was wrong.

By using the equation x=.5(Vo+V)t, I was able to get to x=1/2(Vo+V)(V-Vo/a). By rearranging the values and substituting in I got to 26^2/4 which equals 169 m/s^2. This is not correct either.

Aside from how to do this problem, my question is how can two different approaches that seem perfectly correct to me liberate two different answers?

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Satyr said:
So I know initial velocity is 0 and final velocity is 26 cm/s. I know the displacement (delta x) is 2 and am looking for acceleration...a=v/t; t= D/R = (2cm/26cm/s) = .0769 seconds to travel those 2 centimeters. Since I now have t (just solved for it) and was given the final velocity to begin with, I can plug it into a=v/t to yield 26/.0769 = 338 m/s^2. This approach was wrong. The reason why that is wrong is because of t = D/R. You have R equal to 26. R is equal to 0 at the start and equal to 26 at the end

By using the equation x=.5(Vo+V)t, I was able to get to x=1/2(Vo+V)(V-Vo/a). By rearranging the values and substituting in I got to 26^2/4 which equals 169 m/s^2. This is not correct either.There is nothing to rearrange in this equation. You know all the variables except t
Maybe you know this formula but forgot it?
v^2 = v_o^2 + 2a\Delta x (just solve for a)
If you don't then you would have to use the average velocity. This would be used in your first approach.
V_a_v_g=\frac{v+v_o}{2}
 
In the first case if you indicate R as the velocity, t = D/R is wrong. Because the velocity is not uniform.
The second method is correct and the value of a is also correct.
 
Jebus_Chris said:
Maybe you know this formula but forgot it?
v^2 = v_o^2 + 2a\Delta x (just solve for a)
If you don't then you would have to use the avTHerage velocity. This would be used in your first approach.
V_a_v_g=\frac{v+v_o}{2}

Thank you for clearing up my error in the first approach, I can see it now. As for your suggestion, I have tried that as well and it yields the same answer as my second approach. I feel like a huge fool right now. I found my mistake and, come to find out, my second approach was correct after all.

rl.bhat said:
In the first case if you indicate R as the velocity, t = D/R is wrong. Because the velocity is not uniform.
The second method is correct and the value of a is also correct.

You're right. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top