MHB How to Solve a System of Three Equations with Three Unknowns?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mkelly18790
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Systems
AI Thread Summary
To solve the system of equations a + b = 3, -b + c = 3, and a + 2c = 10, one approach is to first combine the first two equations to form a new equation: a + c = 6. Next, subtract this new equation from the third equation, a + 2c = 10, to isolate c. Once the value of c is determined, substitute it back into the first equation to find a, and then use either the first or second original equation to calculate b. This method effectively simplifies the problem into a manageable two-variable system. The solution process demonstrates the systematic approach to solving multiple equations with unknowns.
mkelly18790
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How do I do:

a + b = 3
-b + c = 3
a + 2c = 10
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would begin by adding the first two equations, and then you have the 2X2 system:

$$a+c=6$$

$$a+2c=10$$

Now, try subtracting the first from the second to get $c$, then use the first along with the value for $c$ to find $a$, and then once you have $a$ and $c$, you can use either the first or second equation from the original system to find $b$. :D

What do you find?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top