MHB How to Solve a Vector Word Problem Involving Airplanes and Wind?

AI Thread Summary
An airplane is flying on a bearing of South 27 degrees West at 485 mph, while a wind is blowing from South 72 degrees East at 35 mph. The velocity vectors for both the plane and the wind are defined using trigonometric functions based on their respective bearings. The resultant ground speed vector is calculated by summing these two vectors. Clarifications are sought regarding the angles used in the calculations, specifically 117 and 162 degrees, and there is a suggestion to create a sketch for better understanding.
Gummg
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
An airplane is flying on a bearing of South 27degrees West at 485 mph. A 35 mph wind is blowing from a direction of South 72degrees East. What is the actual bearing of the plane and the ground speed of the plane? I've been stuck on this problem for so long and am going to ask for help
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello, and welcome to MHB, Gummg! (Wave)

I would write the plane's velocity vector as:

$$\vec{v}=485\left\langle \cos\left(117^{\circ}\right),-\sin\left(117^{\circ}\right) \right\rangle$$

And the wind's velocity vector as:

$$\vec{w}=35\left\langle \cos\left(162^{\circ}\right),\sin\left(162^{\circ}\right) \right\rangle$$

And so the resultant ground speed vector will be the vector sum:

$$\vec{r}=\vec{v}+\vec{w}$$

Can you proceed?
 
MarkFL said:
Hello, and welcome to MHB, Gummg! (Wave)

I would write the plane's velocity vector as:

$$\vec{v}=485\left\langle \cos\left(117^{\circ}\right),-\sin\left(117^{\circ}\right) \right\rangle$$

And the wind's velocity vector as:

$$\vec{w}=35\left\langle \cos\left(162^{\circ}\right),\sin\left(162^{\circ}\right) \right\rangle$$

And so the resultant ground speed vector will be the vector sum:

$$\vec{r}=\vec{v}+\vec{w}$$

Can you proceed?

How did you get 117 and 162 degrees?
 
Gummg said:
How did you get 117 and 162 degrees?

Make a sketch?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top