Analytically Solving Bessel Functions for x Giving J_m(x)=0

man@SUT
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
If we want to find x giving J_m(x)=0 where m=any constants, how can we analytically get x?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think you can do that analytically. (from memory)
 
I also use mathematica to solve but it doesn't help.
 
You'll have an infinite number of real roots.

For large x, you can use the asymptotic formula for J_n(x). If I remember right, the difference between successive roots will tend to \pi for large x.

Alternatively, you could look up tables which give the zeros for various Bessel functions in a mathematical handbook
 
There will be the analytic solution when we assume x -> infinity or x<<1. In the case of the first few values of x giving J_m(x)=0, we might have to use the table to be the last choice. Anyway, thanks mjsd and siddharth.
 
There is the following linear Volterra equation of the second kind $$ y(x)+\int_{0}^{x} K(x-s) y(s)\,{\rm d}s = 1 $$ with kernel $$ K(x-s) = 1 - 4 \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \dfrac{1}{\lambda_n^2} e^{-\beta \lambda_n^2 (x-s)} $$ where $y(0)=1$, $\beta>0$ and $\lambda_n$ is the $n$-th positive root of the equation $J_0(x)=0$ (here $n$ is a natural number that numbers these positive roots in the order of increasing their values), $J_0(x)$ is the Bessel function of the first kind of zero order. I...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
122
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top