How to Solve Complex Equations Involving i

  • Thread starter Thread starter lostinphys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
AI Thread Summary
To solve complex equations involving i, such as z^3 = i, convert the equation to exponential form, where i is expressed as e^(iπ/2). This leads to the equation r^3e^(3iθ) = e^(iπ/2), allowing you to determine that r = 1. To find θ, apply logarithms, resulting in 3iθ + 2ikπ = iπ/2, and solve for θ using different integer values of k. This method parallels finding complex solutions for equations like z^3 = 1. Understanding these steps is essential for solving complex equations effectively.
lostinphys
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Could anyone please explain to me the procedure of obtaining complex solutions of equations where i is involved? For example z^3=i.
Many thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
-i is one solution. I obtained that via more madness than method
 
The usual thing to do would be to write the equal in exponential notation, ie z = re^{i\theta}}, i=e^{i\frac{\pi}{2}}, then for z^3 = i, we would have
r^3e^{3i\theta} = e^{i\frac{\pi}{2}}
From this you can conclude that r = 1. To find theta you take the logarithms,
3i\theta + 2ik\pi = i\frac{\pi}{2}
And then solve for theta, with different values of k (k as an integer).
 
You do it the same way you find the complex solutions of e.g. z^3=1
 
thanks a bunch nicksauce :)
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top