How to Solve for x When y = 2.2 in a Cubic Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CrossFit415
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To find the x value when y = 2.2 in the cubic equation y = x^3 - 5x + 6, substitute y with 2.2 to obtain the equation x^3 - 5x + 3.8 = 0. Numerical methods such as the Newton-Raphson method or the method of secants can be employed to find the roots. Initial estimates suggest a root exists between 0 and 1, with further refinement possible through iterative methods. For a more complex approach, transforming the cubic into a quadratic form can yield additional solutions.
CrossFit415
Messages
160
Reaction score
0
So how would I find the x value when y = 2.2 ?

y=2.2

Y=x^3-5x+6

Thanks. I'm on mobile can't use latex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CrossFit415 said:
So how would I find the x value when y = 2.2 ?

y=2.2

Y=x^3-5x+6

Thanks. I'm on mobile can't use latex

Well plug in y= 2.2 and get 2.2 = x^3-5x+6. You will need to solve using a numerical method most likely.
 
rock.freak667 said:
Well plug in y= 2.2 and get 2.2 = x^3-5x+6. You will need to solve using a numerical method most likely.

I got x^3-5x+3.8=0 but I don't know what to do next.
 
Anyone?
 
CrossFit415 said:
I got x^3-5x+3.8=0 but I don't know what to do next.

What methods for root finding have you learnt? (i.e. what methods for finding 'x' do you know about? Simple algebra, Newton-Raphson method, etc.)
 
CrossFit415 said:
I got x^3-5x+3.8=0 but I don't know what to do next.

-3.8 = x(x**2 - 5)

See if you can stumble upon a haphazard number x that satisfies this eqn ( EG: 1 is very near and satisfactory )

then divide the original eqn by (x- xhaphazard )

Obtain second degree Polynomial where x1,2 =( (-b + sqrt(b**2-4ac)) / 2a and the other root where the sign before sqrt term is a negative )

Good luck.
 
Well, I am not sure I would call it "very close. However, Crossfit415, you can use that to get a better solution: if x= 0, x^3-5x+3.8= 3.8 and if x= 1, itex]x^3-5x+3.8= -.2[/itex]. one valule is positive and the other negative so the function must be 0 between them- that means there must be a root between 0 and 1. .5 is halfway between and (.5)^3- 5(.5)+ 3.8= 1.425. That is positive so there must be a root half way between .5 and 1. Halfway between those is .75. (.75)^3- 5(.75)+ 3.8= 0.471875. Again, that is positive so there must be a root between .75 and 1. Halfway between those is 0.875, etc. Carry that out to whatever accuracy you want and, as stallionx says, divide the polynomial by x- a to get a quadratic equation for the other two roots.<br /> <br /> You might suspect, right from the start, that since -.2 is much closer to 0 than 3.8, the root should be closer to 1 than to 0. That&#039;s correct and a little faster numerical method would be the &quot;method of secants&quot;. Instead of picking exactly half way between possible x values, we calculate the equation of the line between the given points. The line between (0, 3.8) and (1, -.2) is y= -4x+ 3.8. That will be 0 when x= 3.8/4= 0.95. Faster &quot;convergence&quot; to the correct solution but more calculation required at each step.<br /> <br /> &quot;Newton&#039;s method&quot;, replacing the curve by a tangent line at each step, would be even faster but requires Calculus.
 
CrossFit415 said:
I got x^3-5x+3.8=0 but I don't know what to do next.

You could multiply both sides by 5 and perform the rational root test. If that fails though, iterative methods like previous posters have mentioned is the best way to go.
 
Since it's already a depressed cubic you can transform it into a quadratic (in z^3) with the substitution:

x = z + \frac{5}{3z}

However it requires a bit of complex arithmetic and you need to take all three branches of the complex cubed root to get all three (in this case real) solutions.
 
  • #10
Once you find one root by means of be it Newton-Raphson or a computer program, the other 2 are ready to be found by the means I tried to describe above.
 
  • #11
Just as there is a formula for solving a quadratic (x=-b +/- sqrt(b2-4ac) etc...) then there is also a formula for solving a cubic. It does look a bit formidable at first glance, but will simplify in your case because your coefficient of x2 is zero.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubic_function"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top