A How to solve this definite integral?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a complex definite integral involving the incomplete gamma function and exponential terms. Initial attempts using integration by substitution were unsuccessful, leading to a deeper exploration of the integral's structure. The participants derived a series of transformations and substitutions to simplify the integral, ultimately leading to a final solution expression. The final result incorporates elements of the incomplete gamma function and exponential decay, demonstrating the intricate relationships between these mathematical components. The conversation highlights the collaborative effort to tackle challenging integrals in mathematical analysis.
Ad VanderVen
Messages
169
Reaction score
13
TL;DR
How to solve the integral ##\int_{0}^{x}\!-{\frac {\lambda\,{{\rm e}^{-\lambda\,t}}{\beta}^{\alpha} \left( -\lambda+\beta \right) ^{-\alpha} \left( -\Gamma \left( \alpha \right) +\Gamma \left( \alpha, \left( -\lambda+\beta \right) t \right) \right)}{\Gamma \left( \alpha \right) }}\,{\rm d}t##
I would like to solve the integral underneath:

$$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{x}\!-{\frac {\lambda\,{{\rm e}^{-\lambda\,t}}{\beta}^{\alpha} \left( -\lambda+\beta \right) ^{-\alpha} \left( -\Gamma \left( \alpha \right) +\Gamma \left( \alpha, \left( -\lambda+\beta \right) t \right) \right)}{\Gamma \left( \alpha \right) }}\,{\rm d}t$$

I tried it before using Integration by Substitution, but that didn't help either.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The integrand is written as
Ae^{-\lambda t}+Be^{-\lambda t}\Gamma (\alpha ,Ct)
The first term is easy to integrate. What is two variable function of ##\Gamma(\alpha, Ct)## you wrote ?

[EDIT] It is an incomplete gamma function.
 
Last edited:
The only non-trivial part is <br /> \int_0^x e^{-\lambda t} \Gamma(\alpha, kt)\,dt<br /> = \frac 1k \int_0^{kx} e^{-\mu s}\Gamma(\alpha, s)\,ds<br /> where k = \beta - \lambda and \mu = \lambda/k. Now <br /> \Gamma(\alpha, s) = \int_s^\infty t^{\alpha - 1} e^{-t}\,dt = \Gamma(\alpha) - \int_0^s t^{\alpha - 1} e^{-t}\,dt so <br /> \int_0^{X} e^{-\mu s} \Gamma(\alpha, s)\,ds = \int_0^X e^{-\mu s} \Gamma(\alpha)\,ds -<br /> \int_0^X \int_0^s e^{-\mu s - t} t^{\alpha - 1}\,dt\,ds. The first integral is trivial; in the second we can set (u,v) = (\mu s + t, t) and we find that <br /> \int_0^X \int_0^s e^{-\mu s - t} t^{\alpha - 1}\,dt\,ds = \frac{1}{\mu}\int_0^{X}<br /> \int_{u/(1+ \mu)}^u e^{-u} v^{\alpha - 1}\,dv\,du <br /> + \frac{1}{\mu} \int_X^{(1 + \mu)X} \int_{u/(1 + \mu)}^X e^{-u} v^{\alpha - 1}\,dv\,du and after doing the inner integral over v you will be left with integrals of e^{-u} (trivial) and e^{-u} u^\alpha (expressible in terms of incomplete gamma functions).

EDIT: The limits should be 0 \leq u \leq (1 + \mu)X and \max\{0, u - \mu X\} \leq v \leq u/(1 + \mu). That introduces a term of the form \int_{\mu X}^{(1 + \mu)X} e^{-u} (u - \mu X)^\alpha \,du = e^{-\mu X} \int_0^{X} e^{-z}z^\alpha\,dz.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes anuttarasammyak, ergospherical, fresh_42 and 1 other person
Hi folks, I'm trying to respond to your answers, but I can't read them because of the right column, which prevents me from seeing the whole page. I don't know how to click away that column.
 
pasmith said:
The only non-trivial part is <br /> \int_0^x e^{-\lambda t} \Gamma(\alpha, kt)\,dt<br /> = \frac 1k \int_0^{kx} e^{-\mu s}\Gamma(\alpha, s)\,ds<br /> where k = \beta - \lambda and \mu = \lambda/k.

This can be tidied up considerably: <br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \frac{1}{k}\int_0^{kx} e^{-\mu t} \Gamma(\alpha, t)\,dt &amp;= \frac 1k \int_0^{kx} \int_t^\infty e^{-\mu t-s}s^{\alpha - 1}\,ds\,dt \\<br /> &amp;= \frac 1{\mu k} \int_0^\infty v^{\alpha - 1} \int_v^{U(v)} e^{-u}\,du\,dv \\<br /> &amp;= \frac 1{\mu k} \int_0^\infty v^{\alpha - 1} (e^{-v} - e^{-U(v)})\,dv<br /> \end{align*} using (u,v) = (\mu t+s,s) where U(v) = \min\{(1 + \mu)v, v + \mu kx\}. Hence <br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \frac{1}{k} \int_0^{kx} e^{-\mu t} \Gamma(\alpha, t)\,dt &amp;= \frac{\Gamma(\alpha)}{\mu k}<br /> - \frac{1}{\mu k}\int_0^{kx} v^{\alpha - 1}e^{-(1 + \mu)v}\,dv <br /> - \frac{e^{-\mu kx}}{\mu k} \int_{kx}^\infty v^{\alpha-1} e^{-v}\,dv \\<br /> &amp;= \frac{\Gamma(\alpha)}{\mu k} - \frac{\gamma(\alpha, (1+\mu)kx)}{\mu k(1 + \mu)^\alpha} <br /> - \frac{e^{-\mu kx} \Gamma(\alpha,kx)}{\mu k}.<br /> \end{align*}
 
pasmith

For me the non-trivial part is:

$$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{x}\!{\frac {\Gamma \left( \alpha,\beta\,t-\lambda\,t \right) }{{{\rm e}^{\lambda\,t}}}}\,{\rm d}t$$

Please, would you be so kind to start from this equation.
 
pasmith

Sorry for my earlier reply. Now that I've looked again, I've seen that you've actually started from the equation I've suggested.
 
pasmith

With your help I got the final solution for the definite integral:

$$\displaystyle {\frac {{\beta}^{\alpha} \left( {{\rm e}^{\lambda\,x}}-1 \right) {{\rm e}^{-\lambda\,x}}}{ \left( -\lambda+\beta \right) ^{\alpha}}}-{\frac {{\beta}^{\alpha}}{\alpha\, \left( 1+\alpha \right) \left( -\lambda+\beta \right) ^{\alpha}\Gamma \left( \alpha \right) } \left( -{{\rm e}^{-x\beta}} \left( {\frac {\beta}{-\lambda+\beta}} \right) ^{-\alpha} \left( x\beta \right) ^{\alpha}\alpha- \left( x\beta \right) ^{\alpha/2}{{\rm e}^{-1/2\,x\beta}}{{WhittakerM}_{\alpha/2,\,\alpha/2+1/2}\left(x\beta\right)} \left( {\frac {\beta}{-\lambda+\beta}} \right) ^{-\alpha}-{{\rm e}^{-x\beta}} \left( {\frac {\beta}{-\lambda+\beta}} \right) ^{-\alpha} \left( x\beta \right) ^{\alpha}-{{\rm e}^{-\lambda\,x}}\Gamma \left( \alpha, \left( -\lambda+\beta \right) x \right) {\alpha}^{2}+\Gamma \left( \alpha \right) {\alpha}^{2}-{{\rm e}^{-\lambda\,x}}\Gamma \left( \alpha, \left( -\lambda+\beta \right) x \right) \alpha+\Gamma \left( \alpha \right) \alpha \right) }$$
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K