MHB Can This System of Equations Be Solved for Variables x, y, z, and Any?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrk79blr
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a system of equations involving variables x, y, z, and an additional variable "Any." Participants suggest initially setting "Any" to zero to simplify the equations into a linear form. After simplification, three linear equations are derived, but the values for x, y, and z appear to be zero, which leads to confusion regarding the validity of the solution. A suggestion is made to substitute "Any" with a variable K instead of zero to explore different solutions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of proper substitution and manipulation of equations to find valid solutions.
mrk79blr
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
329x / (329x + 276y + 340z + 332Any) =0.5

276y / (329x + 276y + 340z + 332Any) =0.1

340z / (329x + 276y + 340z + 332Any) =0.2

We need to figure x,y,z and Any value. "Any" don't have any equation, so it can be any value.

Anyone can help me how to solve the above problem?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: How to solve this rquation

Don't worry about the Any, for the moment take Any to be zero. Then you have 3 linear equations in 3 variables and I presume that you are studying solving systems of linear equations.
 
Re: How to solve this rquation

DavidCampen said:
Don't worry about the Any, for the moment take Any to be zero. Then you have 3 linear equations in 3 variables and I presume that you are studying solving systems of linear equations.

It is non linear equation
 
Re: How to solve this rquation

It looks linear to me. Why do you think that it is non-linear?
 
Re: How to solve this rquation

mrk79blr said:
It is non linear equation

Sorry it is linear equation only, But when i convert all the variables are coming as zero. Plz advice what i am doing wrong.

I consider Any as zero. So I am ignoring the same from the above equation.

If I simply the equation I will get following result
equation 1
329x / (329x + 276y + 340z) =0.5
329x=0.5 * (329x + 276y + 340z)
329x=164.5x + 138y + 170z
329x-164.5x-138y-170z=0
164.5x-138y-170z=0

equation 2
276y / (329x + 276y + 340z) =0.1
276y= 32.9x+27.6y+34.0z
-32.9x+248.4y-34.0z=0

equation 3
340z / (329x + 276y + 340z) =0.2
340z=65.8x+55.2y+68z
-65.8x-55.2y+272z=0

After simplify the 3 equation i will get 3 equations as follow
164.5x-138y-170z=0
-32.9x+248.4y-34.0z=0
-65.8x-55.2y+272z=0

Now x,y,z value is zero It will solve the above 3 equations. But If i set the values as zero in the actual equation it will not solve

329x / (329x + 276y + 340z) =0.5
276y / (329x + 276y + 340z) =0.1
340z / (329x + 276y + 340z) =0.2

So I am sure i have made some mistake. Please advice me.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Re: How to solve this rquation

So you can solve the given system of equations? I have. What is the answer?

Are you saying that you want to design an algorithm to solve any system of linear equations? You can do this by manipulating matrices.

- - - Updated - - -

Instead of setting Any to zero, perform a substitution. Substitute K for 332Any.

for x, the answer is x = -45K/10*329
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top