MHB How to Solve This Trigonometric Limit as x Approaches Infinity?

Francolino
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi to everyone. I'm new on here (in fact, this is my really first message). I need some help with the next limit, I hope you can help me:

$$\lim_{x \to \infty} \sin (x\pi\sqrt [3] {x^3+3x^2+4x-5})$$​

Thank you so much for your time! :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Francolino said:
Hi to everyone. I'm new on here (in fact, this is my really first message). I need some help with the next limit, I hope you can help me:

$$\lim_{x \to \infty} \sin (x\pi\sqrt [3] {x^3+3x^2+4x-5})$$​

Thank you so much for your time! :)

Hi Francolino,

The limit of your function does not exist. To see why, suppose it did have a limit, $L$. Let $y = \pi x\sqrt[3]{x^3 + 3x^2 + 4x - 5}$. Then $y \to \infty$ as $x \to \infty$. So (*) $L = \lim_{y \to \infty} \sin{y}$. However, as $y$ increases without bound, $\sin(y)$ oscillates between -1 and 1. Therefore, (*) cannot hold.
 
Thanks again, for answering. :)

$$\displaystyle \lim_{x \to \infty} \sin (x\pi\sqrt [3] {x^3+3x^2+4x-5} + 0) = \displaystyle \lim_{x \to \infty} \sin (x\pi\sqrt [3] {x^3+3x^2+4x-5} + [x·(x+1)·\pi - x·(x+1)·\pi])$$

As $x·(x+1)·\pi$ is always a pair number (no matter what intenger $x$ is), so:
$$\displaystyle \lim_{x \to \infty} \sin (x\pi\sqrt [3] {x^3+3x^2+4x-5} \pi -x·(x+1)·\pi) = \frac {\sqrt {3}}{2}$$

What do you think?
 
Last edited:
Francolino said:
Thanks again, for answering. :)

$$\displaystyle \lim_{x \to \infty} \sin (x\pi\sqrt [3] {x^3+3x^2+4x-5} + 0) = \displaystyle \lim_{x \to \infty} \sin (x\pi\sqrt [3] {x^3+3x^2+4x-5} + [n·(n+1)·\pi - n·(n+1)·\pi])$$

As $n·(n+1)·\pi$ is always a pair number (no matter what intenger $n$ is), so:
$$\displaystyle \lim_{x \to \infty} \sin (x\pi\sqrt [3] {x^3+3x^2+4x-5} \pi - n·(n+1)·\pi) = \frac {\sqrt {3}}{2}$$

What do you think?
It doesn't change the previous argument. Look at it this way, the limit of the cubic is essentially linear in x (after the cube root) and will swamp any terms in n, unless perhaps you take n to infinity as well. I'll leave that to the professionals. In this case though, your terms in n will not have an effect when x goes to infinity.

Writing in the "intermediate" step:

$$\displaystyle \lim_{x \to \infty } \sin \left ( x \pi \sqrt [3] {x^3+3x^2+4x-5} - n\cdot(n+1)\cdot\pi \right ) \to \lim_{x \to \infty } \sin \left ( x \pi \sqrt [3] {x^3+3x^2+4x-5} \right )$$

so your n argument doesn't actually change anything.

-Dan
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I apologize myself. I commited a mistake typing my last message. Now, the error is fixed.

Forget about $ n $. It's $ x $, now. Sorry.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top